✔ 最佳答案
The historical evidence is that he was a real person.
We have four accounts of his life. Three by contemporaries that knew him, and the fourth by a scholar who researched his life and only included events for which he was able to interview people with first hand knowledge. Three of the biographies were in common usage and quoted in others writings within 20 years of his ministry. Possible as early as with 8 years for earliest account.
We also have the Babylonian Talmud, which is collection of writings produced between 150 BC and 70 AD by the Pharisees. This includes contemporary accounts of Jesus from some of the same Pharisees who appear as his opponents in the Bible. they state that he was a teacher, healer and miracle worker (through black magic). And that after he was executed by the Romans, his body disappeared from its tomb with his disciples claiming that he had risen from the dead. Why would opponents of Jesus have said that about him if he was not real? Wouldn't they have pointed that out in their writings? Duh!!
Beyond the written event, there is also other historical evidence. Usually with a historical event, you not only have written accounts, but you can see that event reflected in the changes in people around the event.
In the case of Jesus, you have a persecution that the Jewish leaders in Israel brought against the Jewish believers in Jesus between 48 AD and 52 AD. The man who would become the apostle Paul was one of the leaders of these persecution. History shows that close 1 million Jews were persecuted, arrested, imprisoned, exiled and even executed for their faith in Jesus. This was just 15 to 18 years after the ministry of Jesus ended. So the majority of those people would have been alive and living in the area where Jesus supposed taught. They would have known if he was real or not. Yet they refused to renounce faith in him. Many resettled in Egypt were they founded the Coptic church, which is the oldest "denomination" in the Christina faith. Others spread across the Roman Empire taking their faith within them so that with another 10 years the Romans historians were writing about the followers of Jesus and their effect on the Roman world.
That is just some of the evidence that were such a person. Dozens of different sources between 45 AD and 120 AD write about Jesus.
No serious scholar denies that there was a historical "Jesus". They can debate whether his life and teachings have come down to us accurately.