not even he opposed 請問這個為什麽沒用倒裝?

本題. Not even he opposed. →→ Not even did he oppose. ←← "not" 助動詞 + "did" 置於 "he" 主詞之前，這就是「倒置(倒裝)」。
例1. Not even I knew that. →→ Not even did I know that. ←← "not" 助動詞 + "did" 置於 "I" 主詞之前，這就是「倒置(倒裝)」。
例2. You didn't even look at me. →→ Not even did you look at me. ←← "not" 助動詞 + "did" 置於 "you" 主詞之前，這就是「倒置(倒裝)」。
√ 答意見者如下——
「倒置」的場合約有15種，1. 在疑問句裡。2, 3, 4, ……，其餘大多是「強調」用語。
# 本題句子和答者例1(辭典的例句)是一般句子，都是正確的，也就是「否定副詞(置於句首是強調)+主詞+動詞(+受詞)」。
# 「倒置」的例句，主詞前 + do，就是「強調」；而一般句子(非倒置) + do (+動詞)，就是「強調」。

"even" adverb,
eg:-Not even he can oppose, but ohers can certainly do so=can oppose.
eg:-auxilliary verb " not even" placed before "he",noun. has "Inversion".

not even ( 不完全地) 屬於部分否定性副詞,so 不倒裝