Other than a mere mention of the term adjective phrase, the voted answer did not explain what an adjective phrase was, nor did it give examples of the is + of structure. It did not contain any of the additional information that was given by other contributors in the comments. The examples it gave were confusing (The table was made of wood) and irrelevant (The bag was made in silk.) If that was the standard of the best answer, perhaps we can write an answer like the following to any question : The sun rises in the east.Vote for this answer. When the voting is over, someone might give a detailed explanation on why this is the best answer and why the other answers are wrong. My question is: Could this answer have been voted as the best were it not for the vested interest of some of the voters?