✔ 最佳答案
They are legally children. A child, in law, means that they lack the capability to make proper decisions, which is why (among other things), the parents can be held responsible for what a child does, even if only in civil law.
It takes a court judgement to declare that an under-age individual can be judged as an adult and can be assumed to have had the mental capacity to decide for themselves. Many teens are capable of making adult decisions about some things and not others. Children, for the most part, are not seen to have that ability. Full adults are presumed to have that ability whether or not they do, and an adult can be found to lack such a capability due to some mental/cognitive disorder, but it is up to the adult to prove that incapacity (or that adult's representatives, really).
The basic idea is that children are like household animals ("pets"). Whatever they do is because of faulty supervision. The prosecution has to prove that they should have, and could have, and thus likely did, know better. Otherwise, they are treated as if this is time to teach that lesson so they will know better the next time. The idea is to stop future criminal behavior, supposedly. Clearly, the parents have failed, so now it is up to the court to teach the lesson.