請問the poor tabby, was very meek and mild through all the bad treatment she got這句是否was前要加that,不然會有雙動詞,但如果有that那that又不能省,謝?

這一句可以加that

但不是在was前面

that要加在 she got之前

成為

The poor tabby, was very meek and mild through all the bad treatment that she got.

she got形容all the bad treatmen

整句中文

這隻虎斑貓(tabby)在經過不好的對待後

還是非常溫順(meek)與溫和(mild)

句法不太合理, 是不是抄漏了句子的主詞(虎斑貓的名字或代名詞she), 而the poor tabby只是同位語哩？
原句可能是:
She, the poor tabby, was very meek and mild through all the bad treatment she got.

No need "it" before was;
The S is followed by adj. cl.
The poor tabby----S
(that) she got----Nominative, adj cl.
was very meek and mild-----vt +o------adv cl of manner, of result, of comparison, of condition -------No need "it" before "was" because the S being "The poor tabby", not "it".
through all the bad treatment-----adj phr-----of description, of demonstration, of relation , of result.
Rewritten with the same meaning with a noun cl:-eg:-
She (the poor tabby) was----S+vt
very meek&mild----adj phr
through all the bad treatment---prep adj phr
(that she got=that she gotten=that was gotten in her)----noun cl as o

http://vieons.com/?fromuser=fvayhadue

sorry!不是that應該是it , was前是否要加 it ?謝謝