I am the one (who should be) to blame(to be blamed).-------該受責者乃朕也
等於以下兩句：
1.I am the one who should be to blame.
2.I am the one who should be to be blamed.
以上句子從這網頁上看到的。
content://com.sec.android.app.sbrowser/readinglist/0423190335.mhtml
請問知識大大們，此兩句的語意是一樣的嗎？句子2.使用被動式，我應該被責備的那個，用被動式沒錯。 但句子1.沒使用被動式，意思會不會變成是---"我才是那個能指責人的人"。
可是，網頁中提到這兩句意思是一樣的，為什麼呢？謝謝。： )
關於關係子句被動式用法問題。?
2020-12-05 9:43 pm
回答 (5)
2020-12-06 10:27 pm
✔ 最佳答案
(A) 要是一定要表達出"應該"的意思,1與2都不應該用should而應該用ought to.(1) => I am the one (who) ought to blame.
(2) => I am the one (who) ought to be blamed.
(B) 這兩句話意思是一樣的.因為在很多人類的自然語言裡面(英語,中語)在意思明顯的條件之下,主動語氣"常常"被用來取代被動語氣.裡在這裡就因為動詞的應用"should be"而變得太複雜了.
把動詞的考慮去掉後,請參考以下的例子們:
+ I need a car to drive. (O)
+ I need a car to be driven. (X)
+ cheap lunch to eat (O)
+ cheap lunch to be eaten. (X)
所以:
I am the one ought to blame.
I am the one who ought to blame.
都是正確的,而且意思與
I am the one who ought to be blamed.
都是一樣的.
(C) 要是你要說"你才是罵人的人"的話,就要說:
I am the one who ought to issue the blames.
I am the one who ought to do the blaming.
...> 關於解說(C)，為什麼一個是issue the "blames"，而一個是do the "blaming"呢?
因為習慣上,"...to blame"是被罵,"... be blamed"也是被罵.那麼要說主動的行為,就會有特別的寫法.像是我所說的"...issue the blames" and "...do the blaming"都是常常(被)用到的.
(D)糟糕,我又被罵了.沒關係,川普每天罵我8次,多你1次沒差.但是你怎知我的名字是王六呢?
2020-12-09 7:26 pm
我會說：I'm the one who should be blamed.
2020-12-06 8:53 am
1. I am the one who should be to blame.
(X)
2. I am the one who should be to be blamed. (X)
該受責者乃朕也:
a. I am the one who should be blamed.
朕應是受責者:
b. I should be the one who is to blame. (is to blame .... an idiom)
朕應該受責
c. I am to blame.
(X)
2. I am the one who should be to be blamed. (X)
該受責者乃朕也:
a. I am the one who should be blamed.
朕應是受責者:
b. I should be the one who is to blame. (is to blame .... an idiom)
朕應該受責
c. I am to blame.
2020-12-07 3:41 pm
*** 誤信王六, 冇藥可救 !
1. "不應該用should而應該用ought to" ===> 吹毛求疵! 請看看牛津字典怎麽說!
2. I am the one ought to blame. ===> 關係代詞"who"作主詞時怎能删去!
3. I am the one who ought to blame. ===> blame 什麽? blame是及物動詞!
4. I am the one who ought to blame. 意思與
I am the one who ought to be blamed. 都是一樣的.
===> 真荒謬, 駡人與被人駡都是一樣嗎?
1. "不應該用should而應該用ought to" ===> 吹毛求疵! 請看看牛津字典怎麽說!
2. I am the one ought to blame. ===> 關係代詞"who"作主詞時怎能删去!
3. I am the one who ought to blame. ===> blame 什麽? blame是及物動詞!
4. I am the one who ought to blame. 意思與
I am the one who ought to be blamed. 都是一樣的.
===> 真荒謬, 駡人與被人駡都是一樣嗎?
參考: Grammar Point (from Oxford Dictionary)
should / ought
Should and ought to are both used to say that something is the best thing or the right thing to do, but should is much more common:
You should take the baby to the doctor’s.
I ought to give up smoking.
In questions, should is usually used instead of ought to:
Should we call the doctor?
2020-12-05 9:59 pm
In sentence 2. use passive twice become the one who "should be to be". But sentence 1,. without the use of passive, has the meaning that becomes --- "I am the one to blame others(=other people)."
I blame you for your failure.
I am to blame you.
I have nothing to blame myself for.
A better way to write:-
eg:----who should be blamed(for the failure)
--------who should be blamed (for the guilt of the accident).
--------who should be blamed (in this matter).
I blame you for your failure.
I am to blame you.
I have nothing to blame myself for.
A better way to write:-
eg:----who should be blamed(for the failure)
--------who should be blamed (for the guilt of the accident).
--------who should be blamed (in this matter).
收錄日期: 2021-04-11 23:20:25
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20201205134320AA7DS1p