Do you believe the Bible is accurate history?

2020-09-08 10:03 am

回答 (10)

2020-09-08 10:04 am
Obviously not. There is no evidence of a "Great Flood" or many of the other stories.
2020-09-08 10:21 am
No, it most definitely is not.  Nearly everything that it records before and including the kingdom of David either never happened or is highly questionable and after that time it very questionable.  The book of Daniel is very wrong not only about the empires but about basic details about the court life that Daniel is claimed to be a part of. 
2020-09-08 10:08 am
The Bible is the Word of God.  The Bible tells us the past and the future.  The King James Bible is 100% perfect.  Here is the truth: The Lord Jesus Christ is God. Nobody can be good enough to avoid hell. The truth is that death leads to immediate heaven or hell, depending only on whether the person believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, or not. The truth is that the Lord Jesus Christ loves you and wants to bless your life freely :) Most of all, Jesus wants you with Him forever, and not in hell.
.
Believing on the Lord Jesus Christ means being forgiven all sins past and future and means going to heaven. The truth is that every belief except one will lead to eternal torment in the lake of fire for every person. Because nothing pays for our sins except the death and blood of Jesus, the sacrifice of Jesus that is already accomplished by Him . Jesus loves you! The truth is that the Lord Jesus Christ is God, and Jesus died on the cross to pay for all of our sins in full, and then Jesus was buried, and then Jesus resurrected from the dead. Nothing else pays for our sins, not works, not deeds, not religions. So the only way to heaven and to avoid hell, is by believing on Jesus for eternal life (John 6:47), without adding any of your own works (Romans 4:5). Believe in the Lord Jesus Christ to take you to heaven, and you will be in heaven, no matter what, guaranteed. That easy, thanks to Jesus! Tell Jesus that you thank Him that you will be with Him in heaven
2020-09-08 11:46 am
I know for a fact it is not.
2020-09-08 5:42 pm
Absolutely not, its just ancient superstition and should never be taken literally.
2020-09-08 10:33 am
No but I think some of the events have basis in fact.
2020-09-08 11:04 am
True Christians say "Yes"
Nicolaitan Christians say "Most of it"
Atheists, devil worshipers, satanists, they say "No"
2020-09-08 11:48 pm
Archaeology support the Bible! Read here: https://www.jw.org/finder?wtlocale=E&docid=102007410&srcid=share
2020-09-08 11:28 pm
As accurate as we know.
That is: it is best evidence (for nearly everything that it describes).

If there are inaccuracies
it's practically impossible for us to identify them
because
we don't have better evidence.
2020-09-08 6:49 pm
The bible is what is called "Faction” A fictional story set in a factual time and place. Thus the time, place and real historical characters are all correct but the fictional characters and stories are not!

There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record - that is right - not one! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah - all of whom are well recorded!

There is not a single contemporary record from any source and even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!

He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record?

Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!

Pilate is recorded in the Roman record as a somewhat lack luster man but no mention of a Jesus, a trial or crucifixion that would surely have been used to make him look brighter!

At best he was an amalgam of those others but almost certainly never existed!

Not one word of it is contemporary with the period and was not written until several hundred years after the period the story is set in!! How did the apostles write their books more than a hundred years after they would have been dead?

Christianity is an invention of the Italians and that is why it came from the Holy ROMAN Catholic church!

Please realize that those claims for the Old historians are worthless since they were not even born until long after everyone in the stories would have been so long dead!

Josephus AD 37 – AD 100
Tacitus AD 56 – AD 120
Suetonius - 69 – 130 AD
Pliny the Younger, 61 AD – 112 AD
Justin Martyr (Saint Justin) AD103–165 AD
Lucian - AD 120 -180 AD but he was hostile to Christianity and openly mocked it.
Pamphilius AD 240-309 AD
Eusebius AD 263 – 339 AD
Photius AD 877 – 886 AD

Thallus - But there are no actual record of him except a fragment of writing which mentions the sack of Troy [109 BC] Showing that he was clearly not alive in biblical times.

Some even try to use Seneca. 4 BCE – 65 CE but as a Stoic Philosopher he opposed religion yet made not a single mention of a Jesus or Christianity!

Even funnier is trying to claim Celsus AD ? – 177 AD Who said that Jesus was a Jew who’se mother was a poor Jewish girl whose husband, who was a carpenter, drove her away because of her adultery with a Roman soldier named Panthera. She gave birth to an illegitimate child named Jesus. In Egypt, Jesus became learned in sorcery and upon his return presented himself as a god.


收錄日期: 2021-05-04 03:08:36
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200908020338AAtnAiZ

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份