1) The mortgage company fired the mom of Garrett Rolfe, simply for being his mom, and then they publicly made excuses about “diversity and inclusion”.
Because of this, they are going to lose business and they may even face (and obviously lose) a multi-million dollar lawsuit.
2) Aunt Jemima, Uncle Bens, Land O Lakes, and similar brands are voluntarily removing their images and giving impassioned (but financially foolish) PC reasons for doing so.
Because of this, they are going to lose a lot of money long-term because they are going to lose their familiar icon and they are going to get less sales at grocery stores. They’re also pissing off both conservatives, AND the blacks and Indians who might actually want their people to remain on the cover/label.
3) Chick-Fil-A’s owner telling white people to “wash a black person’s feet if they ask” and saying “we are shameful until we apologize”. 76% of Americans are white, and around 85% of Chick-Fil-A’s customers are white. This latest stunt is undoubtedly going to hurt the brand. Being OK with gay marriage probably didn’t hurt Chick-fil-A, but having the audacity to try to shame all whites, is definitely going to hurt their business financially.
4) There are a ton of other examples.
Here’s what I don’t understand. Even if these companies were doing the morally right thing, (and arguably they aren’t), these companies have a long track record of making wise and intelligent decisions that will make them more money.
更新1:
(CONTINUED) I don’t understand why these companies are making decisions that will obviously hurt them financially, when these same companies have a long track record of making smart and economical decisions. This begs the question… Are they being PAID to do this, by globalist organizations, George Soros, the democrat party, etc? How else would it benefit them to do this?