Was King Solomon the youngest of four sons or the only surviving son of David and Bathsheba?

2020-05-18 2:31 pm
In the Scriptures, genealogies usually list only the sons and lists them first to last. 2 Sam. 12: 24 seems to list Solomon as being the only surviving son while 1 Chron. 3 lists him as being the youngest of 4 sons born to David and Bathsheba..
2 Samuel 12:24 (NIV)
24 Then David comforted his wife Bathsheba, and he went to her and made love to her. She gave birth to a son, and they named him Solomon. The LORD loved him;
.
1 Chronicles 3 (NIV)
… these were the children born to David there: Shammua, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon. These four were by Bathsheba[b] daughter of Ammiel …
更新1:

I was hoping that someone Jewish might be able to "clue" me in --- that there was something in the Jewish culture --- a rabbi, Jewish scholar or historian. .   There were many sons born to David, but what differentiates them is who their mother was.  Those four boys were the only ones that noted that Bathsheba was their mother. .   If i remember correctly, by Jewish tradition, a child is considered in genealogy only after they are named (thus the reason that Bathsheba's first son isn't noted).

回答 (4)

2020-05-18 5:44 pm
✔ 最佳答案
My answer is that King David had at least 20 children as well as many unnamed sons of concubines.

“First Chronicles 3:1–9 lists the sons of David. The list reads like this:

"These were the sons of David born to him in Hebron:
The firstborn was Amnon the son of Ahinoam of Jezreel;
the second, Daniel the son of Abigail of Carmel;
the third, Absalom the son of Maakah daughter of Talmai king of Geshur;
the fourth, Adonijah the son of Haggith;
the fifth, Shephatiah the son of Abital;
and the sixth, Ithream, by his wife Eglah.
These six were born to David in Hebron, where he reigned seven years and six months.
David reigned in Jerusalem thirty-three years, and these were the children born to him there:

Shammua, Shobab, Nathan and Solomon. These four were by Bathsheba daughter of Ammiel. There were also Ibhar, Elishua, Eliphelet, Nogah, Nepheg, Japhia, Elishama, Eliada and Eliphelet—nine in all. All these were the sons of David, besides his sons by his concubines. And Tamar was their sister."

Breaking down this list, we first have David’s six sons born in Hebron: 1) Amnon, 2) Daniel, 3) Absalom, 4) Adonijah, 5) Shephatiah, and 6) Ithream.

Next, we have the thirteen sons born to David in Jerusalem: 7) Shimea, 8) Shobab, 9) Nathan, 10) Solomon, 11) Ibhar, 12) Elishama, 13) Eliphelet, 14) Nogah, 15) Nepheg, 16) Japhia, 17) Elishama, 18) Eliada, and 19) Eliphelet.

In addition to the nineteen sons David had by his wives were a number of unnamed sons David fathered through his concubines. He also had a daughter named Tamar. Another son named Jerimoth is mentioned in 2 Chronicles 11:18, although it is unclear whether he is one of the sons mentioned above (using another name) or one of David’s sons by a concubine.

David also had a son with Bathsheba before she bore Solomon. This son died seven days after his birth (2 Samuel 12:16–23), and it is possible that he is not included in this list. If so, the sons of David with his wives would total at least 20. To that total we would add all the unnamed sons of his concubines.

At least three of David’s sons died during David’s lifetime. In addition to the death of Bathsheba’s first son were the deaths of his sons Amnon and Absalom. Another son, Adonijah, was executed shortly after David’s death for trying to usurp the throne (1 Kings 2:25).

David’s son Solomon succeeded him as king and later built the temple of the Lord that David had dreamed of building. Ultimately, Jesus Christ was born as a descendant of David (Matthew 1:1), providing a fulfillment of prophecy and bestowing the greatest possible honor to King David.”


 Christina Williams
2020-05-19 7:32 am
Well...
what do you mean by "only surviving"?

Please THINK about that and be specific.
2020-05-18 3:20 pm
You're asking people here? The only people that could know that were the authors of those texts, so I'd suggest going back in time and asking them which sources they used.
2020-05-18 3:16 pm
The NIV is likely the worst possible translation ever made unless you want to consider the cult translations such as the one the JW's use. Burn it. It is not representative of the Word of God. Use the King James as it is the ONLY translation that uses the Textus Receptus manuscripts.


收錄日期: 2021-05-01 22:09:59
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200518063142AAlBNPA

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份