Tamron Hall research accuracy?

2020-02-04 2:23 pm
  
  So, Tamron Hall show today showed "First palindrome day in 909 years", but ...


  The first one that pops into mind against that reference for Me is 10/02/2001 ... Obviously NOT 909 years ago. I'm pretty sure there are at least a few more.


   Is the fact checking team She uses that bad, or did they just use a source?.



       Thx.
更新1:

  HHHmm, I don't think I caught anything about "Global", now I'll have to watch the PVR'd show again.    Thx to all who answered - Gotta give best to the first response according to Y!Answers sorting though.

回答 (3)

2020-02-04 2:27 pm
✔ 最佳答案
It might be the fact that 02/02/2020 is a palindrome whether you write dates as mm/dd/yyyy (US) or dd/mm/yyyy (everybody else).
2020-02-04 2:28 pm
She probably left it out but she’s referring to the perfect palindrome where it’s the same whether you write the date as mm/dd/yyyy or dd/mm/yyyy. 

11/11/1111 is the same whether you read it as the 11th of November, 1111 or November 11, 1111. 
2020-02-04 2:35 pm
CNN and other sites are quoting that 919 year
thing also, so I think she got from a bad source . 
But CNN added the caveat that your 
first answer said that it is palindrome in 
both European and US date format . 
And therefore , CNN called it the first "global"
palindrome in 919 years. 

https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/02/world/palindrome-day-february-2-2020-intl-scli/index.html


收錄日期: 2021-04-24 07:45:01
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20200204062313AACd7W9

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份