from past history you have always opposed me 文法對嗎?

> ...文法對嗎?

文法上 與語意上都錯很多:

1. from (x) -> for

From the past history, you have always ... (X)
For the entire history, you have always ... (O)

2. past history (x)　verbose: 有歷史不是過去的嗎？
remove "past"

3. history (x) --> ambiguous. The history of what? The human history?
change to:

You have been opposing my ideas since we joined the team.

4. opposing me... 多是指＂惡意的人身攻擊＂
應該改成：

opposing my proposals...
opposed my plans...

大家似乎都在評論寫法而不是文法。

例如有回答說have (always) opposed me應該是have been opposing me並指出這是表示"人身攻擊"不對應該改寫為"客觀的意思"，但have opposed me這動詞寫法本身文法沒有錯。而have always verb(PP)更是常用的寫法表示某些已經成為"習慣"或"一貫現象"或"一直以來"的表達。

因此就算沒有前句From past history修飾，you have always opposed me本身文法文意文句都沒大錯的。重點是表達上寫這句是結論他的作為還是想延續指出你"仍然繼續在oppose me"，假若想說你仍在進行中便如有些回答說應該改寫為you have been opposing me.，否則按句子本身只是表達"總結我對你過去歷史記錄"這是我的結論便停了。

反而前修飾的From past history作為句子引子寫得很錯。首先history字本身已經是含past的意義，因此只有不懂英語的才會這樣寫，英語人一般只會說From the past或From past evident或From my past experience或From your past record等，留意past之後的名詞是指問是past的甚麼而不會寫像history這類本身已是past的名詞。

當然大家都在"考量"你其實想表達甚麼而回答。從文理而言，我建議把前引言的From past history說得清楚點是甚麼的history內容讓你說出對對方這評價。

Error and correction:-
From past history--->From the Past-->For the past years--->Ever since the past ,adv phrase;--->ever since=continuously since;
you have been opposing me.----S V O ;present perfect continuous tense.
Hence:-You have been opposing me ever since.(adverb )

Ever since the past, you have always opposed my ideas.

From past history you have always opposed me.

(1) making a judgement 評價 on "somebody's" behavior
"you" have always opposed me
(2) providing the [reason]
from [past history]

The grammar, as well as the structure, is correct but the expressed reason [past history] is confusing.

To express a better reason :
From what I observed you have always opposed me.
From past experience you have always opposed me.

No. The correct way is:

"From the past, you have always been opposing me."