Why are right-wingers so skeptical about funding research and development?

2019-09-12 9:34 am
If we didn't invest in science, we wouldn't have medicine, cars, Yahoo! Answers, or even your precious guns.

回答 (12)

2019-09-12 9:44 am
✔ 最佳答案
You misunderstand. The question is whether science is better funded by private concerns or public. In my opinion at least, each are better at certain KINDS of research.

The private sector will clearly use research dollars the most efficiently and will pursue incremental technological advancement and applied scientific advancement better than the public sector. Politicians direct R&D money to their home districts or entities that are giving them campaign support. They are notoriously bad at picking what to research. Even govt technocrats don't have a great track record.

However, there are technologies that are simply too expensive or too abstract or which have no obvious road to profitability that nonetheless are beneficial to pursue. The private sector won't pursue them. At least not as quickly. This is where govt funding is good. The moon landing was a huge source of new technologies that the private sector took and turned into practical goods, but space exploration itself, until recently, had no near term profit motive.

The mapping of the human genome is a big one. A huge long running program that will yield massive benefits over time...but too abstract for any one company to invest in. CERN. Fusion research. There's any number of these things. Mind you, all of that is cherry picking the famous successes. HUGE amounts of tax dollars have been wasted on less worthy projects. I read an article once on some of the preposterous things the govt has funded research on...it's embarassing.

But when it comes to researching more incremental things, government should stay out of the way, because the private sector has an amazing track record in that space.
2019-09-12 9:36 am
Science has no place amongst conservative thoughts and prayers.

Praise Trump!
2019-09-12 9:47 am
We have had cars, medicine and firearms since long before government subsidies , favoritism and grants ,,,,,,,,, and Yahoo Answers ,,,,,,, not anything I'd be bragging about
2019-09-12 9:37 am
Instead of putting trillions of dollars towards space exploration (something that'll actually help our species and greatly improve our chances of survival), leftists want to give that money to a bunch low IQ shithole dwelling losers who weren't even considered human by the global scientific community until very recently.
2019-09-12 9:36 am
Who needs science when the white trash got their sister to bang? They don't need no fancy number books for that!
2019-09-12 9:42 am
For one thing, should people pay tax dollars for something to get sold back to them? Really, big pharm takes tax money & wants $200 a pill.
2019-09-12 9:35 am
Today's science has an agenda. They also are bullies who force their theories as facts.

Wow, third Anonymous answer -- lol, knock your socks off.
2019-09-12 9:39 am
of course we should invest in research. we should not let private corporations profit s greatly by taxpayer investments. why are tax payers paying and only the wealthy benefiting
2019-09-12 9:38 am
They have been brainwashed to believe right-wing politicians and right-wing media talking heads more than scientists.
2019-09-12 9:36 am
Did the government invent any of these things?
2019-09-12 9:43 am
When Right-wingers hear the word "science" they immediately start thinking about evolution, and how schools want to teach their kids about evolution instead of just saying "God did it" the way they want. The Right hates academics and highly educated people.
2019-09-12 9:36 am
Are you talking about capitalism? Bahaha! That's why government mandated healthcare is a horrible idea.

收錄日期: 2021-04-24 07:46:24
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20190912013449AAhFKDV

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份