前業主在成交日後，開我的信箱，對方說沒有取信，可否告她? 這是否犯法?她承認前，我們已報警,請問可以怎樣追討?

1. Maybe.

2. Yes.

3. That will be difficulty.

Technically speaking, while mailbox is not a part of the property (i.e. you don't own it), still it is within the owner's control (subject to relevant ordinances). Unless prior arrangement has been made, the previous owner no longer has rights to open the mailbox of the property once the sale is completed. The previous owner's action has constitute civil trespass in the civil law perspective.

Although the previous owner was wrong, the problem here is you have to prove you were injured by the action of the previous owner, i.e. you have to show how the previous owner's action caused your damage. In this case, it is extremely difficult, as:

a. It is unlikely that you have mails to the new property, given the property was just sold recently.

b. You can't prove that any of your mails have been taken away.

On that basis, the best you can do is $1 nominal damage.

It is simply not worth the effort.

你可以告，但有無證據。
被告證詞不可當唯一證據。

成交日後可以開信箱足見尚未過戶，以過戶日為準。

民法第七五八條第一項：「不動產物權，依 法律行為而取得、設定、喪失及變更者，非經 登記，不生效力。」。 上開規定係屬「設權登 記（創設登記）」，即創設物權之登記（登記 要件主義），不動產物權，依法律行為而變動 者，非經登記，則當事人間縱有物權變動之事 實，在法律上亦絕對不生效力。 亦稱「生效登 記」或「絕對登記」。

請問 是要追討 金錢嗎?????????????????
你們有遺失什麼東西嗎?
(或是你們之前有糾紛了嗎?
提告是你們的權利，但自己要找對法條喔。

有案例
拿了別人的傳單，以竊盜罪辦理 ， 最後罰金1千 服一天勞役
----------------------
假設他有一樣信箱的鑰匙，那就換個信箱吧。

然後跟前屋主好好溝通一下吧，就說若有收到他的信件會通知他的