事情大概
大概年頭既時候出去飲酒查牌 在我位置付近搜到兩粒可樂可卡因(實際0.39克) 便衣就叫我認左佢 如果吾係拉哂我所有朋友反去困48小時
反到差館 便衣就教我落哂成份口供!!成份口供都係佢教我落 話:認左落完口供就馬上放你走 好小事罰錢架姐!!
轉左好多次擔保 上庭前另一位便衣同我講 律政師話毒品上搵吾到你指模 搵到同你一齊比人拉其中一個人既指模,,但依然起訴我
事件去到上星期上庭,,由於我無錢..只好搵當值律師 我話吾認罪...上庭既時候法官望一望我就話:佢仲有吸毒!
然後加左我保釋金.要我11月再上庭答辯...仲有申請左法援...但係個律師真係好吾店 口窒窒的...依家非常擔心
問:
1.如果我呢個情況打甩佢既機會大吾大??
2.邊到有得自己去驗毒.證明自己無吸毒?
3.法官第一眼望我就話我有吸毒...有無得換法官???我覺得非常不公正 已經主觀認為我有吸毒
4.如果證物同我無關...淨系口供會吾會告到我入罪??? 答辯不認罪後入左罪又會點判
急!!!!藏毒 但不是我的!!!!!!!?
2018-09-28 8:40 pm
回答 (1)
2018-09-29 8:10 pm
1. The chance still exists.
Based on what you have said, the Department of Justice is aware of the possibility that you are the "owner" of the drug. So they know they have a weak case.
2. You are not required to prove anything. Assuming the only offense charge is drug possession, the Department must prove beyond reasonable doubts that you are not the owner.
Being an user or not does not really matter in this case, as they are not able to prove you as the owner.
3. It actually works in your favour. If the misgistrate is biased against you, it is, by itself, a ground for appeal.
4. Unlikely, given that drug found has created a reasonable doubt for you.
Based on what you have said, the Department of Justice is aware of the possibility that you are the "owner" of the drug. So they know they have a weak case.
2. You are not required to prove anything. Assuming the only offense charge is drug possession, the Department must prove beyond reasonable doubts that you are not the owner.
Being an user or not does not really matter in this case, as they are not able to prove you as the owner.
3. It actually works in your favour. If the misgistrate is biased against you, it is, by itself, a ground for appeal.
4. Unlikely, given that drug found has created a reasonable doubt for you.
收錄日期: 2021-04-30 22:27:40
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20180928124038AA0H72v