US has been plotting Syrian regime change for 70 years odd. Is anyone silly enough to believe their latest pretext?
2018-04-15 7:39 pm
回答 (18)
2018-04-15 8:13 pm
Yes the US has wanted a Syrian regime change and one in Libya, Egypt, Algeria, N&S.Yamen, Iran, Iraq you name it. Brazil, Columbia, Mexico, Valenzuela etc. Hell we want a regime change in California. Hell that is just how we roll! Saudi Arabia can do 9/11 and we don't say sh!t.
2018-04-15 7:41 pm
The world knows the CIA stages these things. No one's laughing at us conspiracy-theorists, anymore :-)
2018-04-15 8:57 pm
The US and UK can't handle Russia setting up naval bases in Syria and Crimea. No one beleives Assad used chemical weapons this past week.
2018-04-15 8:00 pm
Suuuure. And I have a nice bridge to sell you.
2018-04-15 8:26 pm
70 years? Hardly. If they planned that long, you would think they would have done a better job.
No, regime change in Syria was initially an Arab Spring objective. Every regime change of Arab Spring was initiated as part of the Foreign Policy Initiative, the successor to the New American Century project.
The inability of the US military to suppress the insurgency in Iraq as well as the increasing inability to manipulate the public into supporting military actions on foreign soil made the Pentagon realize that the PNAC doctrine of enforcing US global interests through brute military force has failed. The Foreign Policy Initiative proposed instead that global US dominance could more easily be achieved through the use of proxy wars fought by secretly funded and armed foreign factions, further supported by US naval and air power when needed.
Essentially arming terrorists and using them to overthrow governments without the US getting directly involved in any ground wars.
No, regime change in Syria was initially an Arab Spring objective. Every regime change of Arab Spring was initiated as part of the Foreign Policy Initiative, the successor to the New American Century project.
The inability of the US military to suppress the insurgency in Iraq as well as the increasing inability to manipulate the public into supporting military actions on foreign soil made the Pentagon realize that the PNAC doctrine of enforcing US global interests through brute military force has failed. The Foreign Policy Initiative proposed instead that global US dominance could more easily be achieved through the use of proxy wars fought by secretly funded and armed foreign factions, further supported by US naval and air power when needed.
Essentially arming terrorists and using them to overthrow governments without the US getting directly involved in any ground wars.
2018-04-15 8:08 pm
Of all the things that I don't believe, people like you are at the top of the list.
2018-04-15 8:02 pm
It’s called the Middle East mojo.
2018-04-15 7:52 pm
And 30 years before that, the other two coalition members, actively divided up those lands among themselves. Fostering the current problems. Anyone silly enough to believe their latest pretexts?
Sykes - Picot.
Sykes - Picot.
2018-04-15 7:49 pm
It would be very silly to beleive the US has some how has this one unified and consistent goal for over 70 years, when as one of our leaders put it, "we can't even agree on the time of day."
2018-04-15 8:26 pm
Do you think they are also controlling your mind?
2018-04-15 8:14 pm
Yeah, the CIA does do stuff like that, for the rich elite, oil, weapons, drugs. They deal the drugs, they steal the oil and the drugs, with the weapons, that's pretty much how it works, and Syria is oil I think, and Russia have control of it, and the US doesn't want Russia to have control of it, and they're pretty evil and nasty and they attack their people with chemical weapons, but the USA attacked Vietnam, the whole golden triangle with agent orange, leaving scorched earth, or people who still have debilitating disease and chronic painful conditions, millions of them. They left it a ruin, a poisoned ruin, and started growing heroin in Afghanistan. Whenever a small country does something, it's generally because the superpowers allow them to, or force them to, because it's in their interests. That's if they have any interests in the place at all, and if they don't, it doesn't have anything left to steal. They're nasty bastards, acting like they're on the side of "good" but no, it's always been Satan, first and always, primarily in control. Not that I believe in Satan, but I sort of half believe they do, in which case, they worship him, or there's also the Atheistic Satanism, where the view is I am God.
2018-04-15 8:16 pm
Upsetting the balance of power in the ME has paid off like a diamond mine for the GOP. Even before BUSH / CHENEY were sworn into office the RNC and their GOP deep pocket donors had full access to any number of world wide strategic planning think tanks. But for many of us who protested the Iraq War we didn't need to pay anyone or any super computer , we already knew the toxic consequences of upsetting that balance.
Paul Ryan was already a rising star in the GOP when the invasion of Iraq began. It was his long term buget plan that was the blueprint for the House Buget Committee. Useing the taxpayer CC to pay for war was unprecedented until BUSH / CHENEY. Prior to that the USA paid for its wars through shared sacrifice of across the board spending cuts and tax increases. BUSH / CHENEY started TWO foreign wars while simultaneously cutting taxes for the already wealthy and increasing spending on MediCare. It didn't take a think tank super computer to figure out where Americas foreign debt was going. And then of course , BUSH / CHENEY sat back and did NOTHING as the Wall Street Mortgage Crisis Bubble , exploded. Bring the USA and the rest of the world up the brink of a 1930's style DEPRESSION.
A) Only a lobotomized Fox Fake News retard is cabable of ignoring the political "tool" the ME has been for the GOP agenda.
Paul Ryan was already a rising star in the GOP when the invasion of Iraq began. It was his long term buget plan that was the blueprint for the House Buget Committee. Useing the taxpayer CC to pay for war was unprecedented until BUSH / CHENEY. Prior to that the USA paid for its wars through shared sacrifice of across the board spending cuts and tax increases. BUSH / CHENEY started TWO foreign wars while simultaneously cutting taxes for the already wealthy and increasing spending on MediCare. It didn't take a think tank super computer to figure out where Americas foreign debt was going. And then of course , BUSH / CHENEY sat back and did NOTHING as the Wall Street Mortgage Crisis Bubble , exploded. Bring the USA and the rest of the world up the brink of a 1930's style DEPRESSION.
A) Only a lobotomized Fox Fake News retard is cabable of ignoring the political "tool" the ME has been for the GOP agenda.
參考: FORBES - "The Cost of War" Nov 26 2009
https://www.forbes.com/2009/11/25/shared-sacrifice-war-taxes-opinions-columnists-bruce-bartlett.html#15eae90833df
2018-04-16 5:55 am
no you want the regime change
2018-04-16 3:52 am
Delusional much? Americans have the attention spans of goldfish. Quit playing make believe and smarten the hell up.
2018-04-15 8:29 pm
ok
2018-04-15 8:48 pm
70 years. Really? You must be in your 90's, then. I congratulate you on your enormous luck in staying alive, so long a time, when Middle Eastern Muslims murder everyone in sight.
2018-04-15 8:16 pm
Who cares, they need to be put down if they don't even care for their own people
2018-04-15 7:48 pm
Sorry but I think the public realise that horse has bolted.
收錄日期: 2021-04-24 01:02:43
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20180415113927AAdqmlT