Would you rather America have the 2nd Amendment the right to bear arms or would you prefer the government to confiscate all weapons?

2018-03-17 11:44 pm

回答 (11)

2018-03-18 12:10 am
✔ 最佳答案
Disarmed citizens are vulnerable, and there are many historical examples of disarmed citizens being killed and oppressed by their own government. The excuse given by authorities that they need to take guns away from citizens in order to lower crime rates is not supported by facts. Even if a government does not turn on its own citizens after disarming them, people are less safe – because unarmed citizens are easy targets to criminals. Over and over again, it has been clearly shown that taking guns away from citizens does not lead to a decrease in crime but rather a dramatic increase.
Australia has disarmed it’s citizens, and a year later the homicide rate in the largest province is up 300%. The burglaries of seniors is “dramatically” up.
I guess the criminals did not turn their weapons in. Only the innocent law abiding citizens turned in weapons.
In US cities with the highest crime rates, taking guns away from the citizens has not lowered the homicide rate. All it has done is to make it easier for criminals to operate.
The 2nd amendment is not about duck hunting, or deer hunting. It is about having the ability and the right to defend oneself and your family. It doesn’t matter if that threat is a burglar, or the Federal Government. A disarmed population is fair game for any president who may be aspiring to become a dictator. Having its citizens armed was the plain and simple intent of the founding fathers.
2018-03-18 12:06 am
The right to bear arms and protect ourselves. Wherever the governments around the world have confiscated guns from the people the result is usually always Mass Genocide of its people by the government that follows. God forbid.
2018-03-18 4:06 am
I would like to see the 2nd amendment remain undisturbed.
2018-03-17 11:47 pm
the government is the reason for JFK being assassinated and why 9/11 happened and why the truth about both events are still being covered up , nuff said!
2018-03-17 11:46 pm
Quite a false dichotomy. You really think it’s that black and white?
2018-03-18 12:12 am
I am somewhere in the middle on this. Assault rifles should not be made available to the private sector. Hand guns and hunting rifles are okay as long as the person owning them passes a thorough background checks before owning them.
2018-03-17 11:45 pm
I would rather have gun restrictions for crazy people and terrorists. Regulated like it says in the constitution.
2018-03-18 2:14 pm
I don't believe the 2nd amendment is being interpreted correctly so I think the government should confiscate all weapons.
2018-03-18 12:22 am
Have a citizens militia where we can arrest our noisy neighbors.
2018-03-18 1:03 am
I want to buy an M60 machine gun, rocket launchers and surface to air missiles at the flea market. Go USA! MAGA!
參考: I can be ridiculous too.
2018-03-17 11:47 pm
thats tough... i want something in between
2018-03-18 2:32 am
Confiscate,.. obviously


收錄日期: 2021-04-24 01:01:55
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20180317154415AAmOtf8

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份