Higher melting point....
Did it occur to you that you could easily find this information using any number of resources? Looking up copper and zinc on Wikipedia is one way. Or you could look at
www.ptable.com, as I did. It's a shame that some people want everything done for them, rather than doing a bit of work on their own.
So in case you are incapable of using the computer on your own, here are the melting points from
www.ptable.com. And by the way, since this is a chemistry forum, the temperatures are in Kelvin degrees. I'll leave it to you to convert to some other scale.
========= Follow up =========
As for the "why" of the greater melting point of copper, I'm not sure I would explain it based solely on the electron configuration as 不用客氣 has suggested. In fact, we need to get the electron configuration correct.
Cu ..... [Ar] 3d10, 4s1 ............. copper is an exception to the Aufbau principle
Zn ..... [Ar] 3d10, 4s2
Is that really enough difference to account for the difference in bond energies and melting points? Consider the fact that copper (a slightly lighter atom) has a greater density than zinc (8.92 g/cm³ for Cu, vs 7.14 g/cm³ for Zn). This means that the copper atoms are closer together in the metallic crystal lattice and according to Coulomb's law, the shorter distance will mean a stronger force of attraction between each nucleus and all of the neighboring electrons (F = kq1q2 / r²) and a higher melting point for copper.
The pattern is periodic. The elements in group 11 (Cu, Ag, Au) have both greater melting points and greater densities than the slightly heavier elements in group 12 (Zn, Cd, Hg). Of course, the electron configurations are also periodic with Cu, Ag and Au each have an (n-1)d10, ns1 arrangement, compared to (n-1)d10, ns2 for the elements in group 12.
.