By definition it is a selective process (selecting from already existing information), so is not a creative process. It might explain the survival of the fittest (why certain genes benefit creatures more in certain environments), but not the arrival of the fittest (where the genes and creatures came from in the first place)?
The death of individuals not adapted to an environment and the survival of those that are suited does not explain the origin of the traits that make an organism adapted to an environment?
How do minor back-and-forth variations in finch beaks explain the origin of beaks or finches? How does natural selection explain evolution?
I am looking a test that scientist have an idea and put it in a test tube without saying, "we can't know for sure but we think this." I want something put in a test and proven over and over again and not just presuming something. I thought science was to test something and if the test of that time doesn't go with the idea then that is not a good idea or I am wrong?
I will award a best answers but you are not talking about this subject. The scientific Method. Fact= An observation of matter in specific isolated definitions.
Hypothesis= an unverified scientific explanation relationship between facts based upon assumptions which may or may not be recognized by the scientists generating the hypothesis.
Model= Models are representations of reality. Only the most important properties are reflected and minor or unrecognized aspects are not covered.
Theory= Hypotheses that prove capable of explaining observation and making predictions without contradictions over period of time are referred to as "theories". A theory is accepted based on the results thru observations or experiments, which anyone can be reproduce. The scientific method must be repeatable.
Law of Nature= If the truth of a statement is verified repeatably in a reproducible way so that it regarded as generally valid, it is considered to be a natural law.
No one is going thru these steps
How can life come from non-life and put that in an experiment and must be reproduced. And what experiment have shown that natural selection has added in information and not pre-existed ones which happens from a grandfather information missing their children then their children have children receiving information from the grandfather information which is not new information. What testing or test shows that nature have created new information. Why I have not seen this?
