Why isn't the woman who flicked off Trump's motorcade being tried for treason?
2017-11-16 9:07 am
She clearly hates America
回答 (11)
2017-11-16 9:10 am
She was exercising her First Amendment rights you fascist prick.
2017-11-16 9:59 am
No, she clearly hates Trump, which is hardly treasonous. There’s a lot of that going around these days.
2017-11-16 9:17 am
Freedom of expression is NOT treason. I suppose Russian trolls don't know that.
2017-11-16 9:10 am
"Flicked off?" Is that some kind of Russian thing?
2017-11-16 9:12 am
She is a hero. Trump is the one who should be tried for treason.
2017-11-16 9:41 am
It wasn't an act of treason. Something akin to treason would be like if a US President was on foreign soil, dissed the US intelligence community and believed someone like Putin. :)
2017-11-16 9:12 am
Treason means giving aid and comfort to an enemy in wartime. Giving Trump the bird does not directly give aid. It's a form of speech. Ever hear of the First Amendment?
2017-11-16 9:19 am
Because that is not a treasonous act. The GOP would have you bowing to the limos of Wall Street CEOs when they drove by if you're too dumb to figure that out yourself.
2017-11-16 9:16 am
2017-11-16 9:17 am
Because being a dumbass isn't a treasonable offense. It simply the most common trait of democrat voters.
2017-11-16 1:13 pm
Treason is defined in the Constitution as things like starting a war against the country. Simply hating the country is not treason.
收錄日期: 2021-04-24 00:51:12
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20171116010754AAdqLyp