Why do the court say man shouldn’t hit women even in self defense?

You have no source for that outrageous lie.

"Why do the court say man shouldn't hit women even in self defense" - The court or you has awful grammar. It should read WHY DOES THE COURT SAY A MAN SHOULDN'T HIT A WOMAN EVEN IN SELF DEFENSE.

"Do you think this is wrong" - Yes, your grammar is awful.

" I do it like giving a women a free ticket to assault man" - Again, your grammar is awful. This should read
I do. It's like giving a woman a free ticket to assault a man.

Since you add a childish nonexistent "tag" to all of your posts and your poor grammar I'm guessing you are a child. Focus on school instead of making up nonsense because what you are stating it not a fact at all.

Courts don't say that. Self defense laws are the same regardless of gender.

What court says this?

At least in the United States, you're allowed to defend yourself, regardless of your gender or the gender of your attacker.

What court?

I'm betting none.

they don't, assault is assault in the court's eyes

WHERE are you? In the US, the court DOES NOT distinguish between men and women for the purposes of assault OR self defense.

IMO, anything that happens after the first punch is thrown is called SELF-DEFENSE. No matter WHAT SEX throws the first punch.

The courts mostly say that no one should hit anyone except in self defense. The laws against assault are not gender-specific. It might make a difference in how severely the court deals with the assaulter, depending on how much bigger he is than the victim.