求以下辯題的正方論點，論據（英文） Low income families should be allowed only one child. （急！）?

A low income family earns or receives little for their work after "nine years law-suit claim."
Their monthly disposable income from their services are very little.
They can't support a child ,whether sick ,suffered, diseased or death in a non-cruel way.
The child wants the best, but parents can't supply it if more than one child.
Parents need try to economize at the high expense of one child's expense;hence with the sacrifice of more than one child claim.
"It is very expensive to live in HK for the low income families, and too expensive for a child already. Hence need try to economize in spending money !"
"Parents can't spend too much money on more than one child if on an expensive education system HK."
Not enough money used,spent or needed for travelling,shopping,holiday-expenses,care for illness and other talent seeking expenses needed if more than one child.
Parents can't provide a child any sufficient meals at the expense of child's health will bring discredit,ridicule,contempt on a child on an expensive education HK.
It's foolish to go for a second child if parents never have enough money to sustain,to keep up, to maintain, to uphold their daily living in this high-priced,expensive HK.
Further ,parents may lose at the races by betting.
Father may lose his job by carelessness,misfortune, death,etc even if he be allowed only one child !
The lower income group should be allowed only one child.