If more people in the Las Vegas crowd had guns, could the shooter have been suppressed?

2017-10-02 11:49 pm
He was on the 32nd floor of that Hotel. I would be kind of hard from someone on the ground to shoot back without getting a bullet inside someone's hotel room.
更新1:

**TYPOS IN SECOND SENTENCE:** It would be kind of hard for someone on the ground to shoot back without getting a bullet inside someone's hotel room

回答 (6)

2017-10-02 11:51 pm
✔ 最佳答案
While I'm normally a fan of carrying a gun for self-defense, that wouldn't have helped in this case.

You'd be firing into a hotel filled with lots of other innocent people.

Perhaps if you had a rifle with scope and could see the guy shooting from the window...maybe. But that's a very unlikely scenario at a concert.
2017-10-03 12:25 am
Anyone on the ground who could have "stopped" the shooter on the 32nd floor, would have to be some sort of sharp shooter, with a rifle. So more people having guns in the crowd would not have been the answer.
2017-10-03 12:05 am
okay here we go
somebody on the ground opens up
the next thing is they are targeted by other bystanders
then the police wade in and you have a double blood bath
meanwhile the original shooter picks of the survivors
2017-10-03 12:00 am
no,not at all.
2017-10-02 11:52 pm
Pointless.
2017-10-03 12:04 am
Gun nuts don't care. The more dead people, the better. That's American patriotism!

收錄日期: 2021-05-01 21:51:21
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20171002154913AAjl7a7

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份