If traditional data gave enough information, big data ___such an important marketing tool 1.wouldn't have become 2.wouldn't be become 為什麼不是2?

2017-05-11 6:36 pm

回答 (2)

2017-05-13 10:07 am
If traditional data "had given" enough information, big data "wouldn't have become" such an important marketing tool.
條件子句用假設語氣的「過去完成式」,表示條件過去不存在;主要子句用「過去的未來完成式」的would have p.p.,表示這結果過去也不存在。

If traditional data "gave" enough information, big data "wouldn't become" an important marketing tool
條件子句用假設語氣的「過去簡單式」,表示條件現在不存在;主要子句用「過去的未來」wouldn't become,表示之後也不存在。

become不會有be + become的組合,因為become是「不及物動詞」,而be + p.p.的是及物動詞才有的「被動態」形式。

「過去的未來」是在「過去」之後的過去時段內,時序有先後之分。

你給的問題裡的條件子句,可能打錯動詞時態了?
2017-05-11 7:27 pm
Note that you use the past tense of the verb in the if clause;

In expressing wishes and longings, in conditional sentence, in discussing probabilities, suggestions,comments to be expected, advice and opinions, you use the conditional.

If traditional gave enough, big data wouldn't have become-------
Big data wouldn't have become such an important tool, if traditional gave enough......
"wouldn't have become" used instead of "wouldn't become=express a request, a proposal, not a probability"
2. wouldn't be become==/==wouldn't become.


收錄日期: 2021-04-30 21:59:02
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20170511103600AAajZ9J

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份