What was van Fraassen's argument (on behalf of his anti-realism) that theories can be thought of as conjunctions such that all evidence seems to be for one part only?
What is wrong with the argument?
What was van Fraassen's argument (on behalf of his anti-realism) that theories can be thought of as conjunctions?
2017-05-04 4:48 pm
回答 (2)
2017-05-04 6:28 pm
2017-05-04 6:04 pm
I am inquisitive to listen to their arguments. Than only I can give my views.
參考: own
收錄日期: 2021-04-24 00:26:40
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20170504084833AABUTGC