案件有3名犯毒品刑事案被告人，當中一名不認罪，而首次在高院聆訊當日，法官突然在庭上當著3名疑犯面前，提醒其中兩名已認罪疑犯可轉為污點證人，這樣便有機會獲得額外可再扣減判罰刑期。
1這名法官的做法對嗎？
2如果不對，是什麼的不對呢？
3這情況會否對不認罪之疑犯不公平嗎？
4轉為污點証人，大概可減幾多刑期呢？
高院法官提醒疑犯怎樣可減輕刑罰事件一問？
2017-04-27 6:21 pm
回答 (3)
2017-04-28 6:09 am
你問這些問題著實好笑，進了法院就是法官的天下。1你沒聽過坦白從寬嗎?當然對啊。2沒有不對3有做而不認罪，當然法官不爽判很重4減好多喔
2017-04-28 3:19 pm
1. Yes. Once the defendant's guilty plea is accepted, that defendant is no longer a defendant but a convicted offender. There is nothing wrong for a judge to remind the right of a convict.
2. N/A.
3. No. First - there is no obligation for those 2 to cooperate. Second - the remaining suspect still has the right to challenge the testimony/evidence. Beside, in the Court of First Instance, most criminal trials are tried by the jury, not a judge.
4. The Court will evaluate based on the usefulness of the information provided. It is possible that even cooperating with the prosecution can result no reduction in sentencing.
2. N/A.
3. No. First - there is no obligation for those 2 to cooperate. Second - the remaining suspect still has the right to challenge the testimony/evidence. Beside, in the Court of First Instance, most criminal trials are tried by the jury, not a judge.
4. The Court will evaluate based on the usefulness of the information provided. It is possible that even cooperating with the prosecution can result no reduction in sentencing.
2017-04-28 9:19 am
藥師琉璃光如來
收錄日期: 2021-04-24 00:22:19
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20170427102141AAHcHJj