Can anyone arguing against evolution seriously think that they make a case if they can't (or refuse to) show they understand the subject?

They can absolutely make a case! It just won't stand up under scrutiny.

Dig a little deeper and you will find these same people are regularly conned by scammers and politicians. They are a sad little bunch of ignorant gullible no-hopers

I know that I, and many other Young Earth Creationists on here, make a magnificent case for Young Earth Creationism! But if evolutionists want to be ignorant and ignore the evidence for God's existence and the evidence for Young Earth Creationism, then so be it!

How can a case be made against something that never happened.

Evolution is not a science, but is a religion.

Science, of course, involves observation, using on or more of our five senses (taste, sight, smell, hearing touch) to gain knowledge about the world, and being able to repeat the observation.
No living scientist was there to observe the first life forming in some primeval sea.
No living scientist was there to observe the “big bang” some billions of years ago.
No living scientist was there to observe the supposed formation of the earth.
No scientist was there, no human witness was there to see these events occurring.
And they certainly cannot be repeated today.
All the evidence a scientist has exists only in the present. The average person (including students) are not taught that scientists have only the present and cannot deal directly with the past.
Evolution is a belief system about the past based on the words of men who were not there, but who are trying to explain how all the evidence of the present (that is fossils, animals, plants etc.) originated.

Webster’s Dictionary defines religion as follows: “Cause, principle or system of beliefs held to with ardour and faith.” Surely this is an apt description of evolution.

Evolution is a belief system – A RELIGION !

May God bless you as you study His Word

Darwin dyed a Christian , what changed Darwin's beliefs was the apple tree , he dug and found a fossil of the tree many generation back , there was no change , he dug deeper and was over 10,000 year and still no change , he dug even deeper , now about 20,000 years and there was no change in the fossils , if the ensample of this tree had zero change , from droughts to floods hot years to cold and not one change in 20,000 years , by his calculation it should have gone through several changes or even some kind of mutations but nothing . Because of his last findings and no proof of his Theory of Evolution he had recanted at the end .

OK, I answered your question at the link provided. Now go and review it and provide feedback.

CRR YEC

You can't argue someone out of a position they weren't argued in to.

And have YOU applied these...rules...to Creationism?

I think not.

Have you started looking yet at FLAT earth that's got the most
excellent articles, vids out due to great scientific equipment now within financial reach of more keen people?

That helps debunk evolution.

Did you know? Scientists have now found that EARTH is the very CENTRE of the...universe/heavens?

How eager are YOU to look?

I'm busy studying Creation, Flat Earth proof.

But you present your ONE question and then we talk.