should there be an amendment that limits freedom of speech?

A liberal's wet dream, lol! But if we're going to do it, now is the time. We can let Trump and his team define hate speech. Fun fun fun!

Any liberal that finds that alarming should stfu about banning hate speech.

Absolutely not. Not as long as we are a democracy. Our ancestors fought and died to protect this country from communism and fascism. The majority of Americans would do the same. "Better dead than Red".

Only evil communist countries suppress the Freedom of Speech and the freedom of the press.

The Russians just successfully hacked into our elections as well as out allies elections attempting to rule the world. They are already bragging that there is a new world order and they are the leaders.

NO that destroys the whole concept of 'freedom of speech'!

no.

Lemme guess, you want a new freedom, the freedom from being offended.....

NEVER

That's the sort of question you could answer by asking yourself if you'd be okay with limitations that would curtail the kinds of speech ~you~ might be liable to engage in.

No thanks.

You don't need one when you can convince the people that only you speak the truth and all others are lying, creating fake news, and you alone have all the alternative truths and the liberal fascist communist conservative media are the enemies.

Freedom of speech is already limited. You cannot utter threats, you cannot shout "fire!" in a crowded theater, you cannot cite the 1st Amendment as a defense of slander or libel...

Not surprised that Lucille doesn't know any of this.

Yes, but only for people named Michelle.

Dat rude awakening tho.