Why did the appeals court claim there was no evidence of a single terrorist from the 7 banned countries when there have been at least 72?

政治及管治其他 - 政治及管治

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:05 am

更新1:

of them convicted in the US since 9/11? Does this prove the 9th circuit court of liberals are political and not interested in truth and facts before decided cases?

更新2:

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/report-72-terrorists-came-from-7-muslim-countries-trump-targeted/article/2614582

更新3:

No doubt the USSC will overrule the 9th circus court yet again.

更新4:

http://cis.org/vaughan/study-reveals-72-terrorists-came-countries-covered-trump-vetting-order

回答 (10)

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:06 am

Because you are a lying troll?

👍 2 👎 2

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:33 am

The Seattle judge was correct in telling the DoJ attorney there had been no arrests of nationals from the seven countries for terrorist ATTACKS but some right wing media sources misquoted him as saying there had been no arrests for terrorist activity. That would have been untrue when, for example, the Bowling Green Iraqis were arrested for exporting arms and money to terrorists. Perhaps the appeal court judges have been similarly misquoted.

👍 1 👎 0

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:11 am

Because the government's lawyers were so incompetent, particularly Acting Solicitor General Noel Francisco, that they failed to PRESENT that evidence to the court.

Courts don't research the facts. The lawyers have to.

👍 1 👎 1

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:12 am

Most of the terrorists came from Saudi Arabia. However since Trump has businesses dealings there and we get a shitload of oil from them they will never be on the banned list.

👍 1 👎 2

John W

2017-02-12 7:06 am

No, you're wrong.

👍 1 👎 2

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:29 am

You're confused, that's 72 virgins they're supposed to get. There were no terror attacks here from people from those countries. We have always had laws regarding people who come here.

👍 0 👎 0

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:09 am

For

👍 0 👎 1

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:09 am

👍 0 👎 1

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:06 am

👍 0 👎 1

[匿名]

2017-02-12 7:07 am

I thought that was 72 virgins.

👍 0 👎 2

收錄日期: 2021-05-01 21:27:37
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20170211230551AAJ51ok

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份