Libs, Since we need a woman president, I assume you will support Sarah Palin should she run in 2024, right?

Cons go get a job.

Your bulb is a bit dim, champ.

Democrats supported Clinton not because she's female, but because... get this - she proposed pretty standard-issue Democratic policies.

Sarah Palin, meanwhile, would not.

If you want to talk about shallow statements, take a look at your own first.

With this question you have crossed into a whole new level of dipshittyness. Congratulations.

Sarah Palin is braindead. Try again, what else can you blame the Libs for. Maybe Trumps picks for his cabinet, that makes as much sense.

I would only support a sane, intelligent woman.

hehe -- right, sure -- well, not

As a conservative let me just say I'd rather Hillary be president then that dumb b*tch.

No for one thing she can't help but say stupid Sh*T!

Then she couldn't even handle being governor! She was run out of office less then a year after running as GOP VP!

We don't need a woman president, necessarily....we just need a decent one.

I really don't care what's between my president's legs, at least not over the idea of putting whoever is most appropriate for the position in power. That's why I won't support Sarah Palin, as it wouldn't make a difference if she were a man with all the same circumstances. And it's also why I didn't really support anyone - Hillary included - in this past election: They all sucked!

History indicates no. They hate her. Apparently hating on right wing women is acceptable to liberals/feminists.

Sarah Palin? You mean the woman who couldnt handle being governor of a state smaller than a mid-sized city?

Nobody voted for Hillary because she's a woman anymore than people voted for Obama "because he's black" which you racist liars claimed his first day in office.