BBC news today show more children coming into the UK, why was their faces blurred?
回答 (42)
2016-10-24 9:35 pm
Because they aren't children and every sensible person knows it.
2016-10-24 11:41 pm
It is all part of the Shave the Children campaign. Those 'children' are so old that the first thing they need when they land is a razor. They do not want us to see them for ourselves.
2016-10-24 11:01 pm
Probably because many of them are not, in actual fact, children.
2016-10-24 10:12 pm
Privacy.
2016-10-24 9:53 pm
The Daily Star has also blurred the faces of some obvious child migrants to protect their privacy.
2016-10-24 10:22 pm
Because they are young people with a right to privacy who haven't been asked for permission to film them.
Everybody has a right to privacy, unless they put themselves in the public arena, either by courting celebrity or committing crime. Anyone who says differently, is quite simply wrong.
Everybody has a right to privacy, unless they put themselves in the public arena, either by courting celebrity or committing crime. Anyone who says differently, is quite simply wrong.
2016-10-24 9:37 pm
Probably to prevent us from identifying them as non-children. This is just the Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan in action.
Ethnic separatism is still the only solution.
Ethnic separatism is still the only solution.
參考: The BBC (Bolshevik Bulls**t Corporation) is now a globalist government propaganda wing.
2016-10-25 12:13 am
Because as any sane person knows they are not children.
2016-10-24 10:06 pm
Because those children have a RIGHT to privacy and
to their dignity they ARE NOT to be treated by sad old
bitter voyeurs as if they are goldfish in a bowl we know
already that aides VERY close to the British government
see photographing children as a sick and normal practice
The conviction recently of David Cameron's closest aide vile
PATRICK ROCK who was found guilty of being in possession
of images of 10 year old girls in swimsuits for sexual abuse is
evidence of the fact that Britain has a sick issue with what is a
child and what is an adult > and THE VIDEO when you click on
MY name >Nathan< VIDEO is proof that's worldwide knowledge
BRITAIN is WAY way behind on schedules and on numbers for the
fulfillment of their DUTY under INTERNATIONAL LAW to take more
refugees and the responsibility and blame for failing is Theresa May's
Also the vulture photographers and paparazzi like those who drove
Diana to her early grave have created a negative view of the refugees
they have deliberately target photographed adults to make a sensation
EVERY ONE of those refugees and more to follow deserves a bravery
award they have made it they will stay here and are welcome here that
is reflected by huge turnout at Whitehall the other day to publicly say so
to their dignity they ARE NOT to be treated by sad old
bitter voyeurs as if they are goldfish in a bowl we know
already that aides VERY close to the British government
see photographing children as a sick and normal practice
The conviction recently of David Cameron's closest aide vile
PATRICK ROCK who was found guilty of being in possession
of images of 10 year old girls in swimsuits for sexual abuse is
evidence of the fact that Britain has a sick issue with what is a
child and what is an adult > and THE VIDEO when you click on
MY name >Nathan< VIDEO is proof that's worldwide knowledge
BRITAIN is WAY way behind on schedules and on numbers for the
fulfillment of their DUTY under INTERNATIONAL LAW to take more
refugees and the responsibility and blame for failing is Theresa May's
Also the vulture photographers and paparazzi like those who drove
Diana to her early grave have created a negative view of the refugees
they have deliberately target photographed adults to make a sensation
EVERY ONE of those refugees and more to follow deserves a bravery
award they have made it they will stay here and are welcome here that
is reflected by huge turnout at Whitehall the other day to publicly say so
參考: -
Don't forget the VIDEO click *my* name and watch (brace yourselves) !
THIS IS BRITAIN
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
2016-10-24 10:15 pm
To protect their anonymity of course.
2016-10-24 10:25 pm
Because they are supposedly minors. I hear that the people of Great Torrington are up in arms about a number being sent there. The BBC just said North Devon, but people know exactly where it is.
2016-10-25 1:19 am
In the U.S. if they are under 18, they do that to protect the children on TV.
2016-10-25 12:17 am
To hide their beards.
2016-10-25 7:19 am
Why were faces blurred! To protect the children against abuse, breaches of privacy and because they are children (Minors) and in law they cannot be shown.
2016-10-24 10:20 pm
They are children, so their right to privacy transcends your need to gawp and dribble.
2016-10-26 9:25 am
BBC news today show more children coming into the UK, why was their faces blurred... for they are just an innocent one that must be handle with care or any harm from others that have a broken heart and can not think at all even on their own safety sake.
some will tell you story like this one and have a point:
The BBC blurs out the faces of all of these "child" migrants to maintain the fiction that they are all children and none are lying about their ages.
Other media outlets only blur faces where they are legally required to i.e. those that are actually children. We face the ridiculous charade that 20-40 year old male economic migrants are flooding into the UK when actual needy children are left behind.
This circus is all so the rich left can virtue signal to each other about how righteous they are, and not at all like those nasty waycists who voted for Brexit.
Meanwhile these migrants are all housed in scarce social housing in areas inhabited by ordinary people, not in the homes of the rich left or anywhere near the areas where they live.
Just as mass immigration under Labour was used to "rub the Right's nose in diversity", to quote a senior Labour wonk, so mass refugee accommodation will be used to punish people who voted for Brexit. Anyone speaking out against this will be denounced as a nasty waycist
some will tell you story like this one and have a point:
The BBC blurs out the faces of all of these "child" migrants to maintain the fiction that they are all children and none are lying about their ages.
Other media outlets only blur faces where they are legally required to i.e. those that are actually children. We face the ridiculous charade that 20-40 year old male economic migrants are flooding into the UK when actual needy children are left behind.
This circus is all so the rich left can virtue signal to each other about how righteous they are, and not at all like those nasty waycists who voted for Brexit.
Meanwhile these migrants are all housed in scarce social housing in areas inhabited by ordinary people, not in the homes of the rich left or anywhere near the areas where they live.
Just as mass immigration under Labour was used to "rub the Right's nose in diversity", to quote a senior Labour wonk, so mass refugee accommodation will be used to punish people who voted for Brexit. Anyone speaking out against this will be denounced as a nasty waycist
2016-10-25 4:28 pm
They weren't blurred, that was their beards.
2016-10-24 10:09 pm
To preserve anonymity.
2016-10-24 11:17 pm
Because those children have a RIGHT to privacy and
to their dignity they ARE NOT to be treated by sad old
bitter voyeurs as if they are goldfish in a bowl we know
already that aides VERY close to the British government
see photographing children as a sick and normal practice
The conviction recently of David Cameron's closest aide vile
PATRICK ROCK who was found guilty of being in possession
of images of 10 year old girls in swimsuits for sexual abuse is
evidence of the fact that Britain has a sick issue with what is a
child and what is an adult > and THE VIDEO when you click on
MY name >Nathan< VIDEO is proof that's worldwide knowledge
BRITAIN is WAY way behind on schedules and on numbers for the
fulfillment of their DUTY under INTERNATIONAL LAW to take more
refugees and the responsibility and blame for failing is Theresa May's
Also the vulture photographers and paparazzi like those who drove
Diana to her early grave have created a negative view of the refugees
they have deliberately target photographed adults to make a sensation
EVERY ONE of those refugees and more to follow deserves a bravery
award they have made it they will stay here and are welcome here that
is reflected by huge turnout at Whitehall the other day to publicly say so
to their dignity they ARE NOT to be treated by sad old
bitter voyeurs as if they are goldfish in a bowl we know
already that aides VERY close to the British government
see photographing children as a sick and normal practice
The conviction recently of David Cameron's closest aide vile
PATRICK ROCK who was found guilty of being in possession
of images of 10 year old girls in swimsuits for sexual abuse is
evidence of the fact that Britain has a sick issue with what is a
child and what is an adult > and THE VIDEO when you click on
MY name >Nathan< VIDEO is proof that's worldwide knowledge
BRITAIN is WAY way behind on schedules and on numbers for the
fulfillment of their DUTY under INTERNATIONAL LAW to take more
refugees and the responsibility and blame for failing is Theresa May's
Also the vulture photographers and paparazzi like those who drove
Diana to her early grave have created a negative view of the refugees
they have deliberately target photographed adults to make a sensation
EVERY ONE of those refugees and more to follow deserves a bravery
award they have made it they will stay here and are welcome here that
is reflected by huge turnout at Whitehall the other day to publicly say so
參考: -
Don't forget the VIDEO click *my* name and watch (brace yourselves) !
THIS IS BRITAIN
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
2016-10-26 10:58 pm
Because they are under age.
2016-10-26 5:06 pm
Poor photography .
2016-10-26 5:46 am
The BBC blurs out the faces of all of these "child" migrants to maintain the fiction that they are all children and none are lying about their ages.
Other media outlets only blur faces where they are legally required to i.e. those that are actually children. We face the ridiculous charade that 20-40 year old male economic migrants are flooding into the UK when actual needy children are left behind.
This circus is all so the rich left can virtue signal to each other about how righteous they are, and not at all like those nasty waycists who voted for Brexit.
Meanwhile these migrants are all housed in scarce social housing in areas inhabited by ordinary people, not in the homes of the rich left or anywhere near the areas where they live.
Just as mass immigration under Labour was used to "rub the Right's nose in diversity", to quote a senior Labour wonk, so mass refugee accommodation will be used to punish people who voted for Brexit. Anyone speaking out against this will be denounced as a nasty waycist.
Other media outlets only blur faces where they are legally required to i.e. those that are actually children. We face the ridiculous charade that 20-40 year old male economic migrants are flooding into the UK when actual needy children are left behind.
This circus is all so the rich left can virtue signal to each other about how righteous they are, and not at all like those nasty waycists who voted for Brexit.
Meanwhile these migrants are all housed in scarce social housing in areas inhabited by ordinary people, not in the homes of the rich left or anywhere near the areas where they live.
Just as mass immigration under Labour was used to "rub the Right's nose in diversity", to quote a senior Labour wonk, so mass refugee accommodation will be used to punish people who voted for Brexit. Anyone speaking out against this will be denounced as a nasty waycist.
2016-10-25 6:06 pm
If they have been mating with monkeys. are they still human?
2016-10-25 5:32 pm
Because they are adults
2016-10-25 2:19 pm
Because they weren't children
2016-10-25 10:13 am
If they haven't been given permission from their parents or guardian, then they can't be shown on any form of media images, regardless of whether they are migrants or not. It's a basic rule in the U.K. to protect children's privacy.
2016-10-25 3:43 am
In the US, you can't publish pics of minors without parental permission.
2016-10-25 5:02 pm
their faces are blurred , because the horrors they have seen .
2017-03-19 4:16 am
privacy...
2016-11-20 7:00 am
they weren't blurred, that was their beards...
2016-11-05 1:38 am
well, why were faces blurred! to protect the children against abuse, breaches of privacy and 'cause they are children (minors) and in law they cannot be shown...
2016-10-26 8:23 am
because they were a bit sensitive about not having time to shave in the rush for the coaches........
2016-10-26 1:43 am
to protect their privacy. they are under age.
2016-10-26 1:28 am
So people like you won't hunt them down and attack them?
2016-10-26 1:22 am
.
2016-10-26 12:35 am
Those 'children' are so old that the first thing they need when they land is a razor. They do not want us to see them for ourselves.
2016-10-25 10:55 pm
sdsd
2016-10-25 5:25 pm
To protect their identity as required by law.
2016-10-25 2:55 pm
To protect their privacy and identity.
2016-10-25 1:03 pm
To hide their identities from racists and nutters.
2016-10-25 9:04 pm
The purpose is intended to protect the minors from unwanted publicity, or from being picked on by other children or hostile adults that might try to harm them. Rightfully so. Blaming children is so wrong, particularly when they have no control over their young, tender lives. Isn't it curious how a nation is judged by the way it treats CHILDREN, the elderly and their mentally ill and their criminal inmates?
2016-10-25 5:54 am
So the paedophiles can't see them.
2016-10-24 11:55 pm
age ...protection of minors
2016-10-25 9:13 am
obviously to prevent people spotting the so called children was actually in their late teens or older. Thats not to say they should not come in but surely not posing as children and where are the real chilfren ?
收錄日期: 2021-04-21 23:44:42
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20161024133142AA1lhLH