✔ 最佳答案
Trump seems like a big blowhard -- always spouting off whatever is on the mind of those who feel left out of the economy and society. Clinton is a 40 year political insider who apparently can't accept responsibility for anything, can't manage personnel, and lies about anything that isn't covering herself in glory.
Over here, we're living through the worst economic recovery since 1937 -- [the number of jobs created since 2010 is LESS than the increase in the working age population -- which plainly means that we have more people not working today than 6 years ago] -- and Clinton is DEFENDING this as a good result.
Like Britain as a whole, about half the American population is angry with the way the government has managed the economy. They're also angry about the lies, lies, and more lies the government issues when it tries to gloss over poor performance.
Brexit, as viewed from over here, was the triumph of those who have been left out over the defenders of the status quo.
Our election is shaping up as the same thing -- the defender of the status quo [who has stockpiled political favors and campaign dollars for years] versus a complete outsider who plainly says that this isn't working for far too many.
***
Sadly, both seem to favor economic isolationism and dislike free trade -- despite the mountains of economic evidence that free trade is good for jobs, wages, and the economy as a whole. [Clinton because she's financed, in large part, by unions that want protection from cheap imports and Trump because the poor in America see that their jobs went to China or Mexico and won't come back without high tariffs.]
Neither seems inclined to accept evidence of the causes of economic growth [and thus growth in jobs and wages] and both spout populist nonsense in that regard. This despite that the economics profession has largely agreed on these causes since 1995.
My thought is that this is a dismal period for America. Neither candidate's policies will help in the long run. Both will propose harmful policies and Congress will have to resist those policies.
That leads me to forecast at least four years of gloom here -- and the next recession is overdue already; which will increase the pressures to monetize more debt so the politicians can spend more on relief despite the future higher debt service that will require.
[God help us all if/when interest rates return to 'normal' -- neither your budget nor ours could withstand having to pay even five percent on the national debt ... much less the more normal seven percent.]
參考: i'm retired over here -- and it's going to be a rough ride