✔ 最佳答案
I'm against it, so I'm giving you a couple reasons why I am:
1) Cost - Research the difference in the cost of a capital trial compared to the cost of a non-capital trial. And with everything else involved, you will find that it is much, much cheaper to have a regular trial and sentence a person to life than it is to have a capital trial and sentence the person to death. (I'll leave you to find the exact numbers, which varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction).
2) Mistakes - Since it's founding in 1992, the Innocence Project has helped free 227 people wrongfully convicted of the crime they were convicted of, including 20 people who were on death row waiting execution. And most people sentenced to die have their death penalty overturned on appeal, and they serve life without parole instead.
These two you should easily be able to find statistics and actual cases for your report using the US as an example. The other reasons I'm against are just my opinion (life serves the same function by removing the person from society, and that it's a form of vengeance, nut justice).