Could Russia have won WW2 alone?

Yes Russia had the strongest military on Earth

Not likely. They didn't have the production capability to produce the armaments necessary for the war early on. Without Lend-Lease, they would have run out of the supplies necessary to fight.

NoIt's hard to say, would face serious difficulties to defeat Hitler without all the resources they were given in the framework of lend lease, but on the other hand, Russians are Slavs and we Slavs, I myself am a Pole :-)
are tough guys :-)

Yes. Slowly but for sure.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZ2SnuN1N5U

Only if the USA had not supported and Supplied the Nazis from 1933

http://orientalreview.org/2010/10/06/episodes-5-who-paid-for-world-war-ii/

https://www.google.de/#q=americans+who+funded++hitler

https://www.google.de/#q=americans+who+funded+the+nazis+

without SKF of Philidelpia Germany would have run out of Ball bearings in 1942

without Standard Oil supplying 120 octane fuel to the Nazis in 1938 all 500 tons of the stuff the Luftwaffe would Not be able to Fly

Alcoa Cost the Mitchell aircraft Company 10,000 aircraft because of Aluminum shortages Alcoa would Rather Sell to the Nazis than the USA

the List Goes on

Fact is if the USA did 1/2 as much for the UK as they did for the Nazis WW2 would have ended in 1942

Russia was not "in" WW2 - they were only fighting germany
(and would have won without US/UK invading so long as japan didnt attack them,)

they only declared war on japan days before japan surrendered

"Could Russia have won WW2 alone?"

No.

Let's time travel back to the exact moment Russia was in the greatest peril of being defeated, Operation Typhoon itself - the German attempt to take Moscow.. keeping in mind if that goes it is the centre of government and indeed Communism itself, centre of communication and transportation, the nerve centre of the military, etc; and that Stalin had thrown the last of all he had into the defence.

That very same year Lend Lease was arriving on Russia shores:
"The first shipments of tanks were dispatched in 1941, amounting to 487 Matilda tanks , Valentines and Tetrarchs from the UK and 182 M3A1 Stuart light tanks and M3 Lee medium tanks from the USA."
(A total of 22,800 armoured vehicles were supplied to the Red Army during the war, 20 per cent of the total number of armoured vehicles manufactured by Russia)
http://ww2-weapons.com/lend-lease-tanks-and-aircrafts/

A primary reason Operation Typhoon failed and Moscow was saved can be attributed to the British and American threat posed to the Japanese who preferred to garrison troops on supply on that front and in Manchruria than do battle against Russia - Stalin (through the Lucy spy ring) being made aware the Japanese had no plans of offensive action against Russia freed him to take troops from Siberia placing them in Moscow which proved crucial.

Had it not been for Allies period, Stalin would have nobody to ask for a Second Front from, which is exactly what Hitler wanted - to be free in the East to focus everything he had against Russia.
Even in intangable ways "Allies" played a part in Russia not succumbing, and that is why Allies are called Allies. There are countless stories of fresh Panzers mint from the factories being put on trains but never making it out of Germany to the Eastern Front, or any front for that matter being just victims of [western] Allies air supremacy and pilots happy to shoot up anything the moves.

Yes, Russia can achieve anything.

You mean the Soviet Union. It's possible, they might have lost another million men doing it. It would most likely have bogged down into a stalemate.

I honestly think it would just go on until one of them lost to many men and collapse or had a revolution.

I don't think so.

no russia was dealing with a large amount of internal conflict at the time

Not likely. They, as a country, lost 3/4ths of their adult men in the war.

no russia was dealing with a large amount of internal conflict at the time

you mean the soviet union... it's possible, they might have lost another million men doing it... it would most likely have bogged down into a stalemate...

It was very likely that the Soviets could have won the war on their own. The USSR had engaged in massive industrialization programs. The Soviets generally outnumbered the European Axis in both men and equipment. The Soviets had waves of security troops watching over the battles, and they have a lot of tanks produced.

It would have been a different war if it had been between Germany and Russia alone, and thus, for the moment, all bets are off. For a start, if Germany had attacked Russia without Germany being involved in war against France and Britain etc, it would have told the world that Germany had absolutely no integrity at all, assuming the attack came after the "Non-Aggression Pact" signed in August 1939.

Take it from there onwards, maestro.....! And obviously leave the USA out of it.

The answer is no,all the allies were needed against the Axis

No they would need an opponent.

No.
Not exactly though, They might kill all the able-bodied Germans & get most of their men killed too, before declaring a victory. I think, much before this end, might come some sanity to call a stop to this mass-scale, government sanctioned & organised genocide.