Why is American so worried about north Korea?
2016-03-05 3:07 am
I keep hearing about north Korea and America in the news. Why don't American just mind their own business and stop trying to figure out what what they are doing. And the same thing about china. American keeps try to tell these countrys what they can't have or what they can't do. If north Korea wants to have nukes they can and if china what's to have their islands with their military they can. Fuc# American
回答 (5)
2016-03-05 3:18 am
You do understand that if no one makes countries like that stop doing things they will eventually try to take over other countries right?
So, you would have preferred that the US let Hitler take over all of Europe in WWII? That was none of our business either, but we intervened for the greater good of humanity. Just like we prevent North Korea from causing nuclear war in modern times.
So, you would have preferred that the US let Hitler take over all of Europe in WWII? That was none of our business either, but we intervened for the greater good of humanity. Just like we prevent North Korea from causing nuclear war in modern times.
2016-03-05 6:16 am
Yeah! How dare America tell China that they can't claim the territorial waters of much smaller and less powerful nations as their own. **** America even though it won't be America who will get ****** over in this situation but rather Vietnam, Malaysia, Philippines and Brunei but at least that will teach America a lesson?
參考: Start to see how this whole "fuck America" argument starts to fall apart when it's the mice who will suffer more rather than the lions?
2016-03-05 3:46 am
You really need to tell your North Korean Propaganda Office superiors that you aren't ready for the Big Time yet.
Rant and insult reported.
Rant and insult reported.
參考: 100% Disabled Vietnam Veteran - Navy Airborne Electronic Warfare Officer
2016-03-05 3:36 am
24 × Trident I C4 SLBM with up to 8 MIRVed 100 ktTNT W76 nuclear warheads each, range 4,000 nmi (7,400 km; 4,600 mi)
General characteristics SSBN-734 and subsequent hulls upon construction, SSBN-730 to SSBN-733 since refueling
Armament: 24 × Trident II D5 SLBM with up to 12 MIRVed W76 or W88 (300–475 ktTNT) nuclear warheads each, range 6,100 nmi (11,300 km; 7,000 mi)
General characteristics SSGN conversion
Armament: 22 tubes, each with 7 Tomahawk cruise missiles, totaling 154
There were no nukes in Viet Nam?????? WTF over USS Ticonderoga: On 5 December 1965, a Douglas A-4 Skyhawk was lost overboard while the aircraft carrier was 80 miles (130 km) from one of the Ryukyu Islands, Okinawa.[5] The aircraft was being rolled from a hangar bay onto an elevator. The aircraft had mounted on it a B43 nuclear bomb. The pilot, Lieutenant JG Douglas Webster, the A-4E Skyhawk, BuNo 151022, of Attack Squadron VA-56 Champions, and the nuclear weapon were all lost.[6] No public mention was made of the incident at the time and it would not come to light until a 1981 United States Department of Defense report revealed that a one-megaton bomb had been lost.[7] Japan then asked for details of the incident.[8]
VS
A few HE devices with the yield of 1950's era designed tactical nuke.
YOU do be funny boy.
I slept within 1000 meters of 100 tactical warheads for 27 months. Known as NATO V it held V Corps and 3rd Armored Divisions nuclear arty rounds and the honest to God suitcase devices for Nuclear Combat Engineers ALL of which were more lethal than the entire payload of N Korea. 8 inch arty rounds with dial a yield from .5kt to 40 kt...that equaled a 1.7 dead zone radius to a > 17 mile radius dead zone. The gun could not shoot it far enough keep the crew from melting like the wicked witch of the west.
Aflred E Newman.......WHAT! Me worry!
General characteristics SSBN-734 and subsequent hulls upon construction, SSBN-730 to SSBN-733 since refueling
Armament: 24 × Trident II D5 SLBM with up to 12 MIRVed W76 or W88 (300–475 ktTNT) nuclear warheads each, range 6,100 nmi (11,300 km; 7,000 mi)
General characteristics SSGN conversion
Armament: 22 tubes, each with 7 Tomahawk cruise missiles, totaling 154
There were no nukes in Viet Nam?????? WTF over USS Ticonderoga: On 5 December 1965, a Douglas A-4 Skyhawk was lost overboard while the aircraft carrier was 80 miles (130 km) from one of the Ryukyu Islands, Okinawa.[5] The aircraft was being rolled from a hangar bay onto an elevator. The aircraft had mounted on it a B43 nuclear bomb. The pilot, Lieutenant JG Douglas Webster, the A-4E Skyhawk, BuNo 151022, of Attack Squadron VA-56 Champions, and the nuclear weapon were all lost.[6] No public mention was made of the incident at the time and it would not come to light until a 1981 United States Department of Defense report revealed that a one-megaton bomb had been lost.[7] Japan then asked for details of the incident.[8]
VS
A few HE devices with the yield of 1950's era designed tactical nuke.
YOU do be funny boy.
I slept within 1000 meters of 100 tactical warheads for 27 months. Known as NATO V it held V Corps and 3rd Armored Divisions nuclear arty rounds and the honest to God suitcase devices for Nuclear Combat Engineers ALL of which were more lethal than the entire payload of N Korea. 8 inch arty rounds with dial a yield from .5kt to 40 kt...that equaled a 1.7 dead zone radius to a > 17 mile radius dead zone. The gun could not shoot it far enough keep the crew from melting like the wicked witch of the west.
Aflred E Newman.......WHAT! Me worry!
2016-03-05 5:25 am
and if america doesn't want to allow things made in NK or China into the US or to ship US food to either NK or China so they starve
well then Fu# nk and china
right ?
well then Fu# nk and china
right ?
收錄日期: 2021-04-21 17:14:59
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20160304190746AAnXzMl