Is this considered copyright infringement? (Lawyers help preferred)?

2016-01-03 8:53 am
My friend found a photo of a celebrity, and redrew it in her own style. She is not selling the art. Does she need permissions from the celebrity or the photographer, and is this considered copyright infringement?
更新1:

Update: Parts of the image were traced, but not all.

回答 (8)

2016-01-03 9:48 am
You're describing a derivative work, which still requires the permission of the copyright holder.

It's within the educational fair use exception for your friend to do this for her own private learning purposes. However, if she starts sharing it with others, such as by posting it online, she impacts the market for the original work, and is committing copyright infringement. It doesn't matter that she's not selling it.
2016-06-19 3:56 am
Avril Lavigne always has and always will suck and that's a fact. Her hardcore fans deserve to suffer!
2016-04-09 5:48 pm
you mean to sell it? I don't think so. As I had an exhibition of a portrait of a celebrity when I was like 12. I don't particularly enjoy portraits of celebrities, but I don't think it's a copyright infringement, besides, what person would report a portrait or art in general? It's art. Art is all good.
2016-01-03 1:46 pm
If she is keeping it for her own use, no worries.
2016-01-03 10:13 am
If it is similar enough to the original thing to be considered "derivative" of it, then it is technically speaking copyright infringement. However, I wouldn't necessarily panic in practice.

If it's done in private and not shared, that's legal. If it's posted publicly, then as Yeti described, it's technically a copyright violation. However, people post fan art and all that stuff online every day, and almost nobody ever gets sued for this sort of thing. It would hurt them more in the negative publicity than they'd be able to get out of her, even if they found out about it.
2016-01-03 9:44 am
No it's not.
2016-01-03 9:26 am
nothin is considered copyright. if you want the big picture, the world is to damn big to consider something copyright. do what you do, its not copyright, just dont take a picture drawn/made from the internet and repost it FOR SALES PURPOSES. you can remake it and sale it. but other then that its not copy right.
2016-01-03 9:23 am
It isn't a copyright infringement if the image or copyrighted material is changed by 20% or more. I would guess that this would meet that criteria.

收錄日期: 2021-05-01 15:28:37
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20160103005315AAavO2Z

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份