Prove me Wrong?

👨🏻‍🏫 學術台數學

[匿名]

2015-10-31 12:51 pm

更新1:

Every SOLID in this world with a part in the middle is made up of UNEQUIVALENT or PARALLEL line segments, so that no solid object in this world does not disprove this theory, or so I believe. Note that I said every SOLID in this world with a middle par due to the fact that empty rings do not count as a candidate for this theory. If this theory holds, I will research more onto it.

回答 (5)

[匿名]

2015-10-31 2:25 pm

✔ 最佳答案

Line segments have no width and no thickness. They only have length. An infinite number of such line segments will still have no total width and no total thickness. So you cannot represent a solid (with finite width and thickness as well as length) by line segments of zero width and thickness.

It is possible to represent a solid as a collection of 3D rods with very small (but non-zero) width and thickness. This is done in integration to find the volume of a solid using calculus. It works.

👍 0 👎 0

[匿名]

2015-10-31 1:03 pm

You are wrong. You are putting ads instead of maths questions.

👍 1 👎 0

[匿名]

2015-10-31 12:54 pm

I can prove you wrong very easily ...you failed to ask a question..! ...which village idiot dosnt know his way back home?
GOODBYE!

👍 1 👎 0

Iggy Rocko

2015-10-31 12:52 pm

Prove you wrong about what?

👍 1 👎 0

[匿名]

2015-10-31 1:00 pm

^Ouch.

👍 0 👎 0

收錄日期: 2021-04-21 14:50:03
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20151031045126AAD9eht

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份