Trolling, or really that dumb? I can't tell.
Higgs Boson is not supernatural.
You say, "The only answer can be God....".
Well, someone lied to you.
You will find Millions of different answers when you start school.
Real answers about real things.
There's a problem with your logic. Just because you don't understand something doesn't mean that the answer has to be God. That's a cop out. People used to think storms were god punishing them. Now we know it's a simple atmospheric cause and effect, and not related to things we do. So in short God is another word for "I don't know" you may as well be honest and say "I don't know how a god particle exists, but I want to find out" but that's to much thinking for most people.
It was not originally called that. It was first called "the godd**n" particle because the scientist could never pin it down but he knew it existed. The paper was censored.
Scientology is an actual religion founded by Ron L. Hubbard. How are scientologists hypocrites?
"God has to exist" is a personal statement, not proof of anything. God particle is a name, not proof of a superior being. The name was created by a human.
You are indulging in a classic circular argument. And it's scientists, not Scientologists, although I do agree with you that Scientologists are hypocrites.
So why doesn't God need a creator if everything needs a creator? See how that doesn't work without saying the rules don't apply to god, which invalidates your argument.
You should know that the term "god particle" IS NOT used in the scientific community and it is pretty much universally hated by scientists.
Only people invoking the cosmological argument claim that something cannot come from nothing (with the exception being their God somehow). "God" is not a scientific explanation for anything. In science, it's okay to say "I don't know" but if you're making the God of the Gaps argument, then your God is nothing more than a shrinking pool of scientific ignorance.
When you said "scientologist" did you actually mean "scientists"? If so, then that is a huge error in definitions and understanding. If you can make an error that egregious, then you cannot be trusted to understand anything else.
Here's some information about the Big Bang Theory - I hope it's not too deep to understand for you:
Because physicists have not yet formulated a consistent theory that explains how gravity operates on extremely small scales (like those present at the instant of the Big Bang), cosmologists are unable to formulate theories as to what happened before about 10^-43 seconds after the Big Bang. Our universe may have originated as a pointlike entity with nearly-infinite density, or perhaps something else. Our mathematics, instruments, and scientific methodologies may need to be substantially improved before any further progress is made.
"The Higgs boson, the subatomic particle that has brought a Nobel Prize to Francois Englert and Peter Higgs, is so small that its discovery took 40 years. It is so big for physics, though, that it took on the nickname the “God particle.”
Higgs, Englert, and their colleagues theorized in 1964 that there must be something that explains why other particles have mass, why things hold together, why you and I are able to exist. That something is the Higgs boson. "
The use of scientific discovery in a failed attempt to support theistic arguments indicates that religion has now been reduced to grasping at "quantum" straws.
