I work with children who have cancer. I saw that video. Get ready for a long, windy response... addressing a few things stated in other answers, as well.
I am pleased to see the amount of awareness going on right now. This is a subject that, up until about two or three years ago, was pretty hush-hush. Childhood Cancer Awareness Month was ignored by a lot of media who deemed it to be "too sad." I know our local media still won't cover it, and this is the first year our hospital has agreed to acknowledge it.
The video about Mason is NOT the normal result of childhood cancer treatment. Mason had a terrible kind of childhood cancer and did not survive. About eighty percent of children with cancer will reach the "long term survivor" stage, meaning they have lived for five years or more since diagnosis.
That's a figure I've seen posted here many times and know well from the childhood cancer organizations I'm involved in, and it's even in the other responses here. HOWEVER, it is a misleading phrase. If a child dies one day after reaching that 5 year mark, they are STILL counted as "surviving" childhood cancer. I've seen this happen. Last summer, a little girl died two days after hitting the five year mark. During those five years, she had about 3-5 months total where she was in remission. She is considered to be a childhood cancer survivor and is included in that eighty percent, despite the fact that her cancer killed her. So that 80% is not necessarily an accurate number, and it really bothers me to see it.
We had a discussion at work yesterday about the term rare. The rate of childhood cancer in United States is currently considered to be 1 in 285 children. 1 in 285 children will be diagnosed with cancer before the age of 19. That's pretty much one per elementary school. I tell children cancer is rare. When I visit schools to talk about a child's cancer, I tell the teachers and the classmates that it's rare, and most children never know another child who has cancer. What is the definition of rare when it comes to a disease? I don't know. Clearly, far fewer children get cancer than adults, but that 1 in 285 number is too high, and it is higher than it was in 2010 (1 in 330 then.)
It is true that childhood cancer receives a tiny fraction of federal funding for cancer research. I realize that this is because the numbers show that cancer occurs in adults SO much more frequently than in children, but when it's your child who is dealing with cancer, that's a hard pill to swallow, to know that for every $100 spent on breast cancer research, mere pennies are spent on all childhood cancer research. Yet it was research on childhood leukemia that really paved the way for combination chemotherapy, and for using a drug that is used in many different kinds of cancer treatment.
You say that you can't do much to help, but you can. Go to http:
www.curesearch.org and look for a local CureSearch Walk. CureSearch is an organization that raises money for childhood cancer research. They have walks all over the country, and the money stays local. They are always looking for people to create teams or join teams and to volunteer a the walks. Contact your local children's hospital and speak to the child life specialist or social worker in pediatric oncology. Ask what you can do. Most children's hospitals are in need of items that are easy to gather- fun Bandaids, gift cards, new toys for treasure chests and playrooms, etc. We got a donation yesterday of good tissues and scented hand sanitizer, and this was the best donation ever. Hospital tissues are rough and hospital hand sanitizer often smells odd and the kids develop aversions to it, so this made our patients SO happy- three boxes of soft tissues and about 20 mini bottles of hand sanitizer in watermelon, lime, and beach scents. Seems like a little thing, but helps so much.