Why are atheists so afraid to let Jesus in?

Surrendering to imaginary friends is for 5 year old's.

Well first I would have to be a Christian. Which I'm not.

Second - If I wasn't an atheist I would be an anti-theist.

Not without suffering a traumatic head injury. And I'll bet you don't remember a time when you didn't believe in Jesus. That, cupcake, is called indoctrination.

Indoctrinating an adult is much more difficult than indoctrinating a child.

I've heard bad things about those Hispanics from Donald Trump.

For the same reason you are afraid to let Spiderman in,

Why are Christians so afraid to let Thor in ?

-I contend we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods, you will understand why I dismiss yours.- Stephen Roberts

Why are atheists so afraid to let Jesus in?

~~~ No one is afraid to 'let in' someone that only exists in your imagination.
Insanity is in believing that what is imaginary, is not!
That is only your fevered thoughts about the atheists that you vainly and arrogantly and hypocritically judge! No Reality!
No one fears your imaginary friend.
Now go play nicely with him and, maybe you'll learn to Love and become a real Xtian! *__-

We are not "afraid". We are just not gullible enough to fall for childhood fairy tale monsters and alleged "saviors". Why are thumpies afraid to let facts into their little pea brain?

REALITY!

There is not one single mention of Jesus in the entire Roman record - that is right - not one! At the same time as he was supposed to have been around there were a number of Jews claiming to be the messiah - all of whom are well recorded!

There is not a single contemporary record from any source and even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!

He was supposed to have been a huge problem to the Romans and produced wonderful miracles but still not one contemporary record?

Even the bible mentions of him like all other references were not written until many years after his supposed death!

Pilate is recorded in the Roman record as a somewhat lack luster man but no mention of a Jesus, a trial or crucifixion that would surely have been used to make him look brighter!

At best he was an amalgam of those others but almost certainly never existed!

Not one word of it is contemporary with the period and was not written until several hundred years after the period the story is set in!! How did the apostles write their books more than a hundred years after they would have been dead?

Christianity is an invention of the Italians and that is why it came from the Holy ROMAN Catholic church!

Please realize that those claims for the Old historians are worthless since they were not even born until long after everyone in the stories would have been so long dead!

Josephus AD 37 – AD 100
Tacitus AD 56 – AD 120
Suetonius - 69 – 130 AD
Pliny the Younger, 61 AD – 112 AD
Justin Martyr (Saint Justin) AD103–165 AD
Lucian - AD 120 -180 AD but he was hostile to Christianity and openly mocked it.
Pamphilius AD 240-309 AD
Eusebius AD 263 – 339 AD
Photius AD 877 – 886 AD

Thallus - But there are no actual record of him except a fragment of writing which mentions the sack of Troy [109 BC] Showing that he was clearly not alive in biblical times.

Some even try to use Seneca. 4 BCE – 65 CE but as a Stoic Philosopher he opposed religion yet made not a single mention of a Jesus or Christianity!

Even funnier is trying to claim Celsus AD ? – 177 AD Who said that Jesus was a Jew who’se mother was a poor Jewish girl whose husband, who was a carpenter, drove her away because of her adultery with a Roman soldier named Panthera. She gave birth to an illegitimate child named Jesus. In Egypt, Jesus became learned in sorcery and upon his return presented himself as a god.

That's a troll question, right? It's far too rapey to be believable, filled with innuendo and double entendre.