Women, would you accept a political appointment that you were qualified for but not the most qualified for.?

2015-05-25 7:26 am
Say the next President wants to score political points and selects you (though I hate to pick a specific person, you making the decision for Gen. Lori Robinson, who seems a really viable choice.) To be the next Chair of the Cheifs of Staff, you know you can do the job, but really feel the other officers all of whom are men are more qualified than you. You have been told that your qualifications are a happy accident, your sex is the real reason you are being offered the highest uniformed posting.

Do you accept?

http://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-arrival-the-female-four-stars-11407

回答 (3)

2015-05-25 8:08 am
✔ 最佳答案
Are you saying that General Lori Robinson is not qualified for her post?
Could any woman do a worse job than some of the male candidates? Yes, I would accept it and do my best.
2015-05-25 7:44 am
I don't see why she shouldn't. "Qualified" is acceptable -- hell, if you look at public officials of all kinds AND both genders for the last half century MOST (tempted to say all) couldn't be categorized that way.

If you can't get a Zhukov or a Rommel with a spark of genius, a competent if colorless woman who knows how the machine works ain't a bad fallback candidate, if you have the organization's best interests at heart.

Personally, I don't have its best interests at heart. I think it's an evil imperialist machine, and it will continue to mass murder in an attempt to stop the inevitable decline of a dying empire, and a sow oinks just as loud as a boar.

But I think it's funny that people are so upset by the idea of gender equality that they get excited over the gender of the pig.
參考: workers of the world unite
2015-05-25 7:38 am
no


收錄日期: 2021-04-21 16:41:17
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20150524232632AAt0nqD

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份