有關contract law case study

It is a homework. So I will not answer for you as my principal.

However, here are some hints:

1. B should be able to sue for the missing car. Many T&Cs share the same characteristic. This characteristic often make certain clauses of T&Cs unenforceable.

2. B should be able to sue for the injury.

這條是功課，本人只提多出兩點予樓主參考：
1.) is there reasonable notice
2.) 受傷及偷車的免責terms 能否由列明的terms加入？其條件為甚麼？

你好似.... 將 2 個 case 一齊講..... 呢度係2 個 issues....

1) 係停車場既保險法, 的確, 佢地只要有駕駛人既出閘紙, 又比足停車場費, 就可以駕車走, 試問你平時有冇拎身份証, 牌等等去証明先可以走?

2) 天花版石屎掉下, 係屬於物業本身既保養, 停車場只係屬於物業既一部份, 係應該告物業業主, 而如果後來再証明係裝修問題, 業主就告裝修公司.

* 我唔係法律介人, 只係識少少法律, 所以唔可以作為答案, 真正答案你要問法律人仕.

當然是報警，交由警方處理。
一切與合約法何幹？