✔ 最佳答案
1. 100% in chance (imprisonment is a must).
a. This is an act of commercial espionage, not typical dishonesty cases.
b. The crime is premeditated, not an impulsive act.
c. The loss to the company is an unknown.
See it yourself:
http://hk.apple.nextmedia.com/news/art/20021026/2909721
2. The case above resulted 3 months of imprisonment. It should be similar.
2015-02-11 14:55:18 補充:
1. The difference is the Government's expense and further reduction of your sentencing. If you save the Government's resource and are forthcoming, the court can take this into consideration.
2. It is up to the court's discretion. But it can reduce further.