被地產代理追佣金

1. For the girlfriend, the answer is yes, as the signature on the form concludes the commission payment.

For the boyfriend, the answer is it depends. If, before showing the property, either boyfriend or girlfriend has made any comment that they will be buying together, then the answer is yes.

However, if only the girlfriend is the potential owner and the boyfriend incidentally becomes the new owner instead, then the answer is no.

The complication is there is no legal relationship exists between the boyfriend and the girlfriend.

If commission is needed, the boyfriend/girlfriend simply needs to be responsible for their own share. The seller's share will be paid by the seller.

2. Yes. No.

The agreement to represent can be voided due to misrepresentation. Also, the person affected can seek damages in a court of law and/or file a complaint with EAA.

The issue in this case is the agreement has not been voided prior to the sale. And there is no apparent damage (as the property has been sold not related to the presentation by the agent). The owners can use this to bargain for a lower commission. However, none of this will stand as the ground for non-payment.

你講得唔清唔楚，一男一女，邊個簽睇樓紙，邊個同業主成交？如果同某代理簽咗睇樓紙，再以其他方式同業主成交，亦要付某代理佣金，你睇清楚睇樓紙。但男簽名女埋單，代理就冇符。

如果個個都搵地產代理放樓
之後個個都私底下交易
你話有冇問題
佣金又洗唔洗俾
個答案好明顯

一定要比　．．．
如拒絕付佣金，小心物業被剃釘契

1. 一定係照比,冇走雞.
2. 係唔可以.你投訴同比唔比錢係2件事獨立分開.

2015-02-10 13:40:55 補充：
又簡單講多DD,你既情況其實係有案例,法庭最後係睇你2位,到底有冇實質關係,譬如最後係你2位一齊住既,咁緊係輸哂啦,就算你話係你女朋友,都會認為你地係有實質關係.

咁如果唔比又點呢?咁地產梗係唔會就咁算啦,如果只係民事,就慢慢攪啦,假設有位入到刑事,咁你既代價就大D,呢樣野冇人會知結果係點.

建議上黎講,比番人啦,始終一開始你都預左筆錢比佢地架啦.