離婚分產法律問題

2015-02-06 5:34 pm
我跟先生準備離婚,我們共同擁有一層物業,但就財產分配意見不合,想請問如果不幸要打官司,財產會被如何分配?謝謝。
我們在10年準備結婚,雙方家長各借出23萬去置物業,當時樓價為150萬,一年後他的家長再借出90萬幫我們贖樓,之後再過半年我們賣了樓,當時樓價為320萬。
然後再一年後我們再置業,樓價為470萬,但由於是樓花,所以要在一年後才能入住,即是2015年1月,剛收到樓,他就說要跟我離婚,然後自己入去住,一個人供2年,再把它賣了,而賣樓後不是平分,要先減去他方之前借出的90萬後才平分,我覺得不合理,他更說自己這4年給家用比我給的多(頭2年他6千我3千,後兩年他9千我5千),如果要打官司,我得到的會比他提出的更少,叫我接受。。。
對我來說他太薄情了,要跟我計成這樣,我想問,如果真的要打官司,律師會如何判?謝謝。

另外如何最後我不答應他的要求,他不肯賣樓,可以怎樣辨?(樓是聯名的)
更新1:

剛剛問了律師意見,他說法庭不會以誰給錢給得較多去判決,而是以婚姻年期,經濟能力及其他因素去判,除非有特別原因,否則一般都是會平分物業。。。亦叫我以租約形式把物業租給他,不能給他就這樣進去住,如果不想太狠,可以以供樓費用的價格去租給他,因這樣會影響判決。 這是真的嗎?還是律師在哄我去打官師罷了?

回答 (3)

2015-02-06 8:45 pm
✔ 最佳答案
呢個係複雜,以實際擁有人作定義,可能連雙方家長都算係,任何一方提出反對,層樓都賣唔到.

咁條數點計呢,似乎你著數d,第一,佢比既係家用,而唔一定係供樓既錢,第二,新屋由你頂左2年,權益都係你大d.

最後如果打官司,你可能得到更少,睇你用咩角度去睇,譬如洗左幾百萬律師費,直頭大家都冇著數啦.

ps:佢唔賣樓,唯有睇下邊個死先,另一人就技術上擁有100%業權,係冇計.

2015-02-06 12:49:13 補充:
我建議係打官司之前,搵一個識計數,而又雙方都信任既人去調解下,可能係親戚朋友掛.
其實最不幸既結局,就係d錢比哂律師.

記住識計數唔係真係要科學化去計,而係藝術性去計出一個令2位都過到既方案.
2016-04-18 8:53 am
哈囉 ! 大大

我可以建議你去仁寶當舖哦!!

在中壢往桃園方向中華路二段 YKK對面

我也是去那裡借的 店長很好商量 會給你方便的

保密 利息也很低 !服務態度也很親切

我也是我朋友介紹我去那的

而且她們在網路上的評價也很好哦

你可以去網路上搜尋 仁寶當舖

他們很專業 過件率也很高 評估完你的條件馬上放款

事後你有什麼問題 打過去給他們 他們都會盡量配合你

你可以去了解看看 !祝你好運~~~
2016-02-17 4:19 am
這位網友你好

我本身也有遇過這問題

急需用錢 找銀行真的太慢了

我知道 中壢仁寶當舖 有在幫人代辦二胎

估價速度快 放款速度快 息低保密

你可以去詢問看看

我之前有在那裡借過 服務態度好 辦事效率好

真的是短期週轉的好幫手

放心啦!仁寶當舖是政府立案合法當舖

網路上的風評也非常好

在 中壢YKK對面 03-4520077
2015-02-06 9:57 pm
You are going to lose badly.

Your husband is correct that all money loaned (or gifted) by parents should be excluded, as none of them is considered as martial property. Excluding interests, the husband will get $1.13 million and you will get $230,000 first for the loans.

Your husband is also correct that as his contribution to the family is more than you, he is in fact entitled more than half of the remaining proceed. Based on your information (husband-wife income ratio is 2:1), assuming the current property can be sold at the same price as purchase, he can easily convince the court to award $2.5 million after the loan of $900,000 and you get the rest ($1.3 million).

Your husband's current proposal, using the same assumption, is an offer of $1.9 million including the $230,000 in loan.

In short, your husband is in fact more than generous.

Unfortunately, hiring a lawyer will make it worse by wasting more money and time. In your case, a good lawyer will tell you accept this deal as this is the best ever you can get. You can fight this all the way, but you will never get any sympathy from a court.

(Although you may have some leeway in your situation (like maintenance), based on the offer, it does not sound like your husband is willing to work around.)

Please note - the judge, not the lawyer, determines what you are entitled.

Under Partition Ordinance, either sides can force another side for a court-ordered sale. So it is not a matter of yes or no, but when and how much.

My personal advice to you are:

a. Don't stall this case - a quick resolution is in your better interest.

b. Try to agree on a fixed amount instead of the current offer. There are simply too many variables to affect the payout. Also, see if he can come up with that amount as well.

2015-02-07 13:58:36 補充:
Think about this - what exactly is the difference between your husband's offer and the lawyer's word?

2015-02-07 16:43:06 補充:
Continued at Comment.

2015-02-07 16:43:57 補充:
Additional advice:

c. You are not obligated to trust 1 lawyer or person. You can get multiple consultation and compare what others say.

2015-02-07 16:44:47 補充:
d. Nothing is predictable in the court. Even an experienced lawyer can set back by the judge's decision. This is why settlement is always the best option (to avoid uncertainty).

Even the lawyer says he/she can win 100%, he/she can still lose on technicalities.

收錄日期: 2021-04-20 15:25:31
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20150206000051KK00007

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份