為何不斷續擔保?

The answer is no - no such guideline exists.

However, the person can choose the following:

a. Refusing bail (in that case, the police must decide if they want to release without bail or move for prosecution immediately); or,

b. Ask a court to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus, based on the bail situation



2014-12-14 04:02:44 補充：
1. There is no such thing as safe. It is only a matter of choices.

2. Somehow when you don't know the procedures.

3. Find a lawyer first.

2014-12-14 17:18:15 補充：
1. No one knows. Police is not obligated to share progress.

2. This is the exact issue - since the case is small, resources are prioritized to major cases.

Let's say your friend is telling the truth. A medical examination of the victim should resolve the case. So there is no need for the rush.

2014-12-15 03:59:18 補充：
Yes and yes.

Also - Department of Justice is an independent department. The Department does not need to listen to the police to charge a person.

2014-12-16 03:43:38 補充：
1. Of course - your understanding is correct.

2. When this happens, it means the police has worked the case for a while.

3. No. A confession can't be the sole evidence. Not admitting is a protection of your rights.

4. No as it will be a waste of time.

2014-12-18 04:19:23 補充：
1. Yes.

2. I will not address the assault issue as it is too remote unless your friend has complained.

3. I am not sure what do you mean by O.N.E. But due to the severity of the offense, binding over is usually not an option.

Usually, dismissal is the proper resolution for injustice.

首先你老友比警察打果d我唔理,因為其實有冇犯事都唔應該被打,其次係可以就呢件事獨立投訴,亦唔會因為有打過你朋友,佢就變成冇罪.

如果拖左半年都唔落案,即係唔夠料,可以拒絕保釋,同警察講,夠料就直接落案.