破產後的業權

2014-10-22 8:10 am
唔好意思,本人12年前因財務問題申請破產,而當時有一間居屋的50%業權被破案管理局充公, 而另50%屬於先生(沒有破產), 宜供款一直都有証明可全是老公供款,宜且間屋剛好在銀行按揭完畢。

最近破產受托人要求先生出錢購入本人的半份業權(現在已歸破產管理署所有)或一同賣出及信上提及有可能要收回老公的另一半物業的租金,他說因另一半業權是破產管理署的,所以需計回,但是否如我能証明由頭到尾都只係老公供款,是否可扣除番他的租金?

那是否如估價樓價50% 後是90萬,宜12年的租金係60萬,那我是否只需支付30萬就能購回另一半業權?

回答 (3)

2014-10-22 9:38 am
✔ 最佳答案
由於居屋是以長命契方式聯名業權,如沒得相方同意下轉讓,新的持份者無權使用此物業,就算半業權人破產,破產管理署所也無權出賣及使用此物業,除非破產人同意新持份者使用物業,居屋長命契約是不可修改,因另一半業權是破產管理署的,將來閣下佰年後業權可能落入對方處,一般你願意買回業權可低到40%=90=45=30%20萬.至於你用老公供款理由是另一方法,提醒妳夫妻為一體,要有足夠証明及理據.
2014-10-30 8:13 pm
hi 我正正幫客戶處理緊同樣CASE, 可以比D意見同方案你...
可CALL 我或whatapp 9373 1283 關小姐^^
2014-10-22 1:45 pm
1. No.

2. No. The Receiver, in this case, intends to ask you paying $1.2 million ($900,000 for the 50% and $300,000 for the rent).

In this case, you will need a lawyer in most of the case (unless you intend to pay, which I don't think so) as a legal battle seems unavoidable.

The detail (mortgage, bankruptcy, etc.) is a key in this case. However, since none of the information has been provided. It is difficult to say what can happen.

However, to avoid paying the large amount of lump sum to the Receiver, the only way is to challenge the ownership, which can't be done without a legal battle.

Due to extremely lack of information, it is difficult to say.


收錄日期: 2021-04-15 17:00:16
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20141022000051KK00002

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份