PARTTIME與散工的分別

2014-10-11 10:12 am
半年前搵左份PART TIME
一路以為自己係PART TIME,點知前幾日被告知不是PART TIME 只是散工
但出糧PART TIME與散工都是出現金
想請問兩者有何分別,,會否劣於PART TIME以及日後可否聲稱這段期間是PART TIME?

回答 (3)

2014-10-11 6:40 pm
✔ 最佳答案
與其解釋part-time和兼職,不如直接回答你所要問的

無論你所做的工種是甚麼,你聲稱part-time的話,對方會覺得你能力有限,或者自己有其他原因(例如要照顧家人仔女等)而不找/做全時間的工時...

散工的意思一般都是全職的(即是盡量每個月都做足26-30日),所謂散工意思是按每人支薪水(所以可能只是口頭招請-跟一個判頭等:所以有回答是自僱),當然散工也有是part-time的,但假如係這種就更差,因為不單只是每天請(一段時間被人請)還每天工作不夠8小時...

你自己想想告訴對方你做part-time(即是每工作都不是全日),還是告訴對方做散工每個月都做足30日,那一種是你的情況。[當然有人每天做兩至三份part-time,那又另講啦。]
2014-10-11 4:29 pm
兼職是公司工會有合約,散工是自僱,不設合約,當然你可自訂合約,不過佢一定唔啋你。
2014-10-11 1:30 pm
Part-time describes the hours worked.

Temporary work (散工) describes the nature of the employment.

They are not the same.

It is possible for a person to have a long-term position as a part-timer. It is also possible for a full-timer to be a temporary worker.

2014-10-11 06:22:19 補充:
They are pretty much the same in term of how employers look at them.

But they are different in term of meanings.


收錄日期: 2021-04-11 20:53:29
原文連結 [永久失效]:
https://hk.answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20141011000051KK00018

檢視 Wayback Machine 備份