有關瞻養費問題

1. It is based on the circumstance. However, the court tends to award custody to the mothers unless the mother is deeded to be incompetent.

2. Since the household expense (for maintenance calculation) is paid by a third-party (In a divorce proceeding, only your husband and you are the parties of the case. The rest are considered third-parties), it is impossible for a court to order that third-party to pay unless there is any evidence that the income/assets are commingling with the third-party (for example, the husband works for his mother and instead of paying salary, a stipend or living allowance is given).

In this case, it will be difficult to say.

按一般情況，初生嬰兒一般會判交母親照顧！其實未成年的兒童，撫養權大多判給女方！除非母親放棄或確實未有能照顧嬰兒的能力，方會改交父親負責！如果雙方關係算是融洽，願意為孩子的利益著想，能平心靜氣地溝通和解決問題的話，則其實可以雙方共同撫養，即雙方都擁有相同的監護權利，現今法庭一般都鼓勵採用！當然要視乎雙方的意願和能否合作！
按婚姻法， 離婚後未必一定要付贍養費，視乎雙方的協議。其中一方如生活上有經濟問題如撫養子女，可向法庭提出，如法庭判定要付贍養費，不付會負刑事責任。多少錢則由雙方協議，如未能達成協議便由法庭判決。如果你沒有工作，贍養費會由男方付，若你有工作則要看雙方收入的情况，由收入較高的一方支付。

如男女相方生活背境相差不太遠指(非經濟條件),女方得撫養權會高些,相方都有責任支付撫養費,一般由富有的一方多付,又或跟據離婚前生活情况作指引.

贍養費是由富有的一方付給非富有的一方或將共有財產結合再平分,如果妳丈夫現時的財富不多,妳可選擇收取像晶式一圓贍養費,留待他日妳丈夫發達,接收遺產後又或他的祕密財富暴光後才向他追收贍養費 .詳情問代表妳的律師最清楚了.

第一點考慮係過往由邊個一直照顧,而非考慮邊個出錢照顧.

第二係維持不低於過往生活,但如果你老公有資產,分身家可能會仲有利,但兩者只能選其一.