問家庭崗位歧視的問題?

The answer is no unfortunately.

What you have mentioned is defined as reverse discrimination, which is a discrimination against the majority of the people.

In this case, the Ordinance does not cover such discrimination.

However - Basic Law's Article 25 says

"All Hong Kong residents shall be equal before the law."

Based on that interpretation, the Court (but probably not EOC) will accept that the Ordinance applies to reverse discrimination as well.

It is best if you can consult a lawyer.

只有想法而沒有行動是不會犯任何條例的. 至於加班問題,不論已婚未婚都可以拒絕的, 這與家庭崗位歧視條例無闔. 以下的情況是可能觸犯家庭崗位歧視條例的例子: 兩個女性同時申請一個職位, 一個已婚, 一個未婚, 已婚的女性無論學歷及工作經驗都比未婚女性稍高, 而結果已婚女性落選, 原因是面試的負責人認為已婚的女性因為需要照顧家人, 對工作的投入程度相對會較低, 因此而不聘用她. 如果真的是這樣, 那位負責面試的主管便很大可能觸了犯家庭崗位歧視條例. 如果在你說的情況下, 如上司因為照顧有家庭負擔的同事而 裁減沒有家庭負擔的同事, 這種情況若出現在私人機構, 這是無可爭議的同時亦無可奈何.

首先你既情況,係絕對唔屬於條例入面訂明既保障範圍,因為係冇得反向推論.

而你既同事(有家室兒女),就可以行使以上條件,但前提係,同事係咪家中唯一照顧者,例如有老公睇住個女,就唔算係,否則絕大部份既人都有家庭成員,個個都可以咁講.

你自己黎講,勞工法例係講明有權拒絕OT,但就唔可以引用家庭崗位歧視條例.