＊請幫忙argument outline!

Q1.
立場: No.
animals are lives. it is not fair to them if we use them for research since animals and us are both lives. (眾生平等的意思)
Counter argument(ca): 人類較高等，但其實大家都是生命，人類沒權剝削動物權益 有可能絕種
ca:有好多動物，但可能導致生態唔平衡

沒必要用動物。 Studies have shown that you can grow human skin from donated cells which you can test instead of torturing and probably killing the poor little animals.



Q2.
立場：no

對於輸家，可能有打擊以致對該項目失去興趣及信心 對於比賽者，有可能只重視結果或獎項，以致失去該項目本來的精神

1) Should animals be used for research ?
It is my opinion to against that research with reasons as follows:
a) They are living creatures with feelings and emotions like human beings,if they were used for studying,testing and operation without their consents; as the result, we'll be held responsible for charge of commit murder;
b) If we took it for granted and go ahead to do that research and the result might not be applicable to or as good for human beings.
2) Does competition is good for us?
There are two reasons as being against it;
a) Usually, if the rules of competition were favourable to competitor of one side, as the result the other side would feel being cheated;
b) Moreover,if the judge was not independent or doing a favour for competitor of one side then the other side would be unhappy, frustrated or even gave up that competition.